more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10232

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / e. Caesar problem ]

Full Idea

Cantor's theorem entails that there are more property extensions than objects. So there are not enough objects in any domain to serve as extensions for that domain. So Frege's view that numbers are objects led to the Caesar problem.

Clarification

How do we know that Julius Caesar is not a number?

Gist of Idea

Property extensions outstrip objects, so shortage of objects caused the Caesar problem

Source

report of George Cantor (works [1880]) by Stewart Shapiro - Philosophy of Mathematics 4.6

Book Ref

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Philosophy of Mathematics:structure and ontology' [OUP 1997], p.127


A Reaction

So the possibility that Caesar might have to be a number arises because otherwise we are threatening to run out of numbers? Is that really the problem?


The 49 ideas from George Cantor

We form the image of a cardinal number by a double abstraction, from the elements and from their order [Cantor]
Ordinals are generated by endless succession, followed by a limit ordinal [Cantor, by Lavine]
Cantor developed sets from a progression into infinity by addition, multiplication and exponentiation [Cantor, by Lavine]
The 'extension of a concept' in general may be quantitatively completely indeterminate [Cantor]
Cantor gives informal versions of ZF axioms as ways of getting from one set to another [Cantor, by Lake]
Cantor needed Power Set for the reals, but then couldn't count the new collections [Cantor, by Lavine]
A set is a collection into a whole of distinct objects of our intuition or thought [Cantor]
Cantor's Theorem: for any set x, its power set P(x) has more members than x [Cantor, by Hart,WD]
Cantor proved that all sets have more subsets than they have members [Cantor, by Bostock]
The continuum is the powerset of the integers, which moves up a level [Cantor, by Clegg]
If a set is 'a many thought of as one', beginners should protest against singleton sets [Cantor, by Lewis]
Cantor showed that supposed contradictions in infinity were just a lack of clarity [Cantor, by Potter]
Property extensions outstrip objects, so shortage of objects caused the Caesar problem [Cantor, by Shapiro]
Cantor says that maths originates only by abstraction from objects [Cantor, by Frege]
Infinities expand the bounds of the conceivable; we explore concepts to explore conceivability [Cantor, by Friend]
Cantor says (vaguely) that we abstract numbers from equal sized sets [Hart,WD on Cantor]
CH: An infinite set of reals corresponds 1-1 either to the naturals or to the reals [Cantor, by Koellner]
Cantor: there is no size between naturals and reals, or between a set and its power set [Cantor, by Hart,WD]
Cantor's Continuum Hypothesis says there is a gap between the natural and the real numbers [Cantor, by Horsten]
Cantor extended ordinals into the transfinite, and they can thus measure infinite cardinalities [Cantor, by Maddy]
Continuum Hypothesis: there are no sets between N and P(N) [Cantor, by Wolf,RS]
Continuum Hypothesis: no cardinal greater than aleph-null but less than cardinality of the continuum [Cantor, by Chihara]
Cardinality strictly concerns one-one correspondence, to test infinite sameness of size [Cantor, by Maddy]
The Axiom of Union dates from 1899, and seems fairly obvious [Cantor, by Maddy]
Cantor's sets were just collections, but Dedekind's were containers [Cantor, by Oliver/Smiley]
There are infinite sets that are not enumerable [Cantor, by Smith,P]
Cantor's Paradox: the power set of the universe must be bigger than the universe, yet a subset of it [Cantor, by Hart,WD]
The powerset of all the cardinal numbers is required to be greater than itself [Cantor, by Friend]
Cantor named the third realm between the finite and the Absolute the 'transfinite' [Cantor, by Lavine]
Cantor proved the points on a plane are in one-to-one correspondence to the points on a line [Cantor, by Lavine]
Cantor took the ordinal numbers to be primary [Cantor, by Tait]
Cantor presented the totality of natural numbers as finite, not infinite [Cantor, by Mayberry]
Cantor introduced the distinction between cardinals and ordinals [Cantor, by Tait]
Cantor's theory concerns collections which can be counted, using the ordinals [Cantor, by Lavine]
Cantor showed that ordinals are more basic than cardinals [Cantor, by Dummett]
A cardinal is an abstraction, from the nature of a set's elements, and from their order [Cantor]
Cantor tried to prove points on a line matched naturals or reals - but nothing in between [Cantor, by Lavine]
Cantor's diagonal argument proved you can't list all decimal numbers between 0 and 1 [Cantor, by Read]
A real is associated with an infinite set of infinite Cauchy sequences of rationals [Cantor, by Lavine]
Irrational numbers are the limits of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers [Cantor, by Lavine]
Irrationals and the Dedekind Cut implied infinite classes, but they seemed to have logical difficulties [Cantor, by Lavine]
It was Cantor's diagonal argument which revealed infinities greater than that of the real numbers [Cantor, by Lavine]
Cantor proposes that there won't be a potential infinity if there is no actual infinity [Cantor, by Hart,WD]
The naturals won't map onto the reals, so there are different sizes of infinity [Cantor, by George/Velleman]
The Continuum Hypothesis says there are no sets between the natural numbers and reals [Cantor, by Shapiro]
Only God is absolutely infinite [Cantor, by Hart,WD]
Cantor proved that three dimensions have the same number of points as one dimension [Cantor, by Clegg]
Trying to represent curves, we study arbitrary functions, leading to the ordinals, which produces set theory [Cantor, by Lavine]
Pure mathematics is pure set theory [Cantor]