more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10332

[filed under theme 28. God / A. Divine Nature / 4. Divine Contradictions ]

Full Idea

The very idea of omniscience is dubious, at least for the communitarian epistemologist, since knowing is a social state, and knowledge is a social status, needing a position in a social network.

Gist of Idea

Omniscience is incoherent, since knowledge is a social concept

Source

Martin Kusch (Knowledge by Agreement [2002], Ch. 4)

Book Ref

Kusch,Martin: 'Knowledge by Agreement' [OUP 2004], p.42


A Reaction

A nice test case. Would an omniscient mind have evidence for its beliefs? Would it continually check for coherence? Is it open to criticism? Does it even entertain the possibility of error? Could another 'omniscient' mind challenge it?


The 17 ideas with the same theme [contradictions in our concept of a supreme being]:

In Empedocles' theory God is ignorant because, unlike humans, he doesn't know one of the elements (strife) [Aristotle on Empedocles]
If Plato's God is immaterial, he will lack consciousness, wisdom, pleasure and movement, which are essential to him [Cicero on Plato]
Why shouldn't the gods fear their own destruction? [Cicero]
God can do anything non-contradictory, as making straightness with no line, or lightness with no parts [Auriol]
An omnipotent will cannot make two things equal or alike if they aren't [Cudworth]
Perfections must have overlapping parts if their incompatibility is to be proved [Leibniz]
A God who cures us of a head cold at the right moment is a total absurdity [Nietzsche]
It is hard to grasp a cosmic mind which produces such a mixture of goods and evils [James]
A person with non-empirical attributes is unintelligible. [Ayer]
You can only know the limits of knowledge if you know the other side of the limit [Searle]
If God is omniscient, he confronts no as yet unmade decisions, so decisions are impossible [MacIntyre]
In the Bible God changes his mind (repenting of creating humanity, in the Flood) [Armstrong,K]
Presumably God can do anything which is logically possible [Chalmers]
Omniscience is incoherent, since knowledge is a social concept [Kusch]
God cannot experience unwanted pain, so God cannot understand human beings [Sorensen]
How could God know there wasn't an unknown force controlling his 'free' will? [PG]
An omniscient being couldn't know it was omniscient, as that requires information from beyond its scope of knowledge [PG]