more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 10399

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 1. Nature of Properties ]

Full Idea

Some properties may not be universals, if they can only be exemplified by one thing, such as 'being identical with Socrates'.

Gist of Idea

If a property such as self-identity can only be in one thing, it can't be a universal

Source

Chris Swoyer (Properties [2000])

Book Ref

'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.2


A Reaction

I think it is absurd to think that self-identity is an intrinsic 'property', possessed by everything. That a=a is a convenience for logicians, meaning nothing in the world. And it is relational. The sharing of properties is indeed what needs explanation.


The 19 ideas from 'Properties'

If a property such as self-identity can only be in one thing, it can't be a universal [Swoyer]
Conceptualism says words like 'honesty' refer to concepts, not to properties [Swoyer]
The F and G of logic cover a huge range of natural language combinations [Swoyer]
If properties are abstract objects, then their being abstract exemplifies being abstract [Swoyer]
Various attempts are made to evade universals being wholly present in different places [Swoyer]
Extreme empiricists can hardly explain anything [Swoyer]
In the iterative conception of sets, they form a natural hierarchy [Swoyer]
One might hope to reduce possible worlds to properties [Swoyer]
Intensions are functions which map possible worlds to sets of things denoted by an expression [Swoyer]
Research suggests that concepts rely on typical examples [Swoyer]
If laws are mere regularities, they give no grounds for future prediction [Swoyer]
Two properties can have one power, and one property can have two powers [Swoyer]
Logical Form explains differing logical behaviour of similar sentences [Swoyer]
Anti-realists can't explain different methods to measure distance [Swoyer]
The best-known candidate for an identity condition for properties is necessary coextensiveness [Swoyer]
Can properties have parts? [Swoyer]
There are only first-order properties ('red'), and none of higher-order ('coloured') [Swoyer]
Supervenience is nowadays seen as between properties, rather than linguistic [Swoyer]
Maybe a proposition is just a property with all its places filled [Swoyer]