more on this theme
|
more from this text
Single Idea 10421
[filed under theme 7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 5. Supervenience / a. Nature of supervenience
]
Full Idea
Supervenience is sometimes taken to be a relationship between two fragments of language, but it is increasingly taken to be a relationship between pairs of families of properties.
Gist of Idea
Supervenience is nowadays seen as between properties, rather than linguistic
Source
Chris Swoyer (Properties [2000], 7.17)
Book Ref
'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.51
A Reaction
If supervenience is a feature of the world, rather than of our descriptions, then it cries out for explanation, just as any other regularities do. Personally I would have thought the best explanation of the supervenience of mind and body was obvious.
The
23 ideas
from Chris Swoyer
14592
|
Some abstract things have a beginning and end, so may exist in time (though not space)
[Swoyer]
|
14593
|
Quantum field theory suggests that there are, fundamentally, no individual things
[Swoyer]
|
14595
|
Can properties exemplify other properties?
[Swoyer]
|
14594
|
Ontologists seek existence and identity conditions, and modal and epistemic status for a thing
[Swoyer]
|
10399
|
If a property such as self-identity can only be in one thing, it can't be a universal
[Swoyer]
|
10400
|
Conceptualism says words like 'honesty' refer to concepts, not to properties
[Swoyer]
|
10401
|
The F and G of logic cover a huge range of natural language combinations
[Swoyer]
|
10403
|
If properties are abstract objects, then their being abstract exemplifies being abstract
[Swoyer]
|
10402
|
Various attempts are made to evade universals being wholly present in different places
[Swoyer]
|
10404
|
Extreme empiricists can hardly explain anything
[Swoyer]
|
10405
|
In the iterative conception of sets, they form a natural hierarchy
[Swoyer]
|
10406
|
One might hope to reduce possible worlds to properties
[Swoyer]
|
10408
|
Intensions are functions which map possible worlds to sets of things denoted by an expression
[Swoyer]
|
10409
|
Research suggests that concepts rely on typical examples
[Swoyer]
|
10407
|
Logical Form explains differing logical behaviour of similar sentences
[Swoyer]
|
10410
|
Anti-realists can't explain different methods to measure distance
[Swoyer]
|
10412
|
If laws are mere regularities, they give no grounds for future prediction
[Swoyer]
|
10411
|
Two properties can have one power, and one property can have two powers
[Swoyer]
|
10413
|
The best-known candidate for an identity condition for properties is necessary coextensiveness
[Swoyer]
|
10416
|
Can properties have parts?
[Swoyer]
|
10417
|
There are only first-order properties ('red'), and none of higher-order ('coloured')
[Swoyer]
|
10421
|
Supervenience is nowadays seen as between properties, rather than linguistic
[Swoyer]
|
10420
|
Maybe a proposition is just a property with all its places filled
[Swoyer]
|