more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 10453

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 3. Constants in Logic ]

Full Idea

In standard first-order logic the role of proper names is played by individual constants.

Gist of Idea

In logic constants play the role of proper names

Source

Kent Bach (What Does It Take to Refer? [2006], 22.2 L1)

Book Ref

'Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language', ed/tr. Lepore,E/Smith,B [OUP 2008], p.538


The 21 ideas from 'What Does It Take to Refer?'

An object can be described without being referred to [Bach]
What refers: indefinite or definite or demonstrative descriptions, names, indexicals, demonstratives? [Bach]
If we can refer to things which change, we can't be obliged to single out their properties [Bach]
Fictional reference is different inside and outside the fiction [Bach]
We can refer to fictional entities if they are abstract objects [Bach]
We can think of an individual without have a uniquely characterizing description [Bach]
You 'allude to', not 'refer to', an individual if you keep their identity vague [Bach]
Definite descriptions can be used to refer, but are not semantically referential [Bach]
It can't be real reference if it could refer to some other thing that satisfies the description [Bach]
Free logic at least allows empty names, but struggles to express non-existence [Bach]
In logic constants play the role of proper names [Bach]
In first-order we can't just assert existence, and it is very hard to deny something's existence [Bach]
Proper names can be non-referential - even predicate as well as attributive uses [Bach]
Millian names struggle with existence, empty names, identities and attitude ascription [Bach]
Since most expressions can be used non-referentially, none of them are inherently referential [Bach]
Context does not create reference; it is just something speakers can exploit [Bach]
'That duck' may not refer to the most obvious one in the group [Bach]
People slide from contextual variability all the way to contextual determination [Bach]
What a pronoun like 'he' refers back to is usually a matter of speaker's intentions [Bach]
Information comes from knowing who is speaking, not just from interpretation of the utterance [Bach]
Just alluding to or describing an object is not the same as referring to it [Bach]