more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 10458
[filed under theme 19. Language / F. Communication / 5. Pragmatics / a. Contextual meaning
]
Full Idea
People slide from contextual variability to context relativity to context sensitivity to context dependence to contextual determination.
Gist of Idea
People slide from contextual variability all the way to contextual determination
Source
Kent Bach (What Does It Take to Refer? [2006], 22.2 L3)
Book Ref
'Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language', ed/tr. Lepore,E/Smith,B [OUP 2008], p.543
A Reaction
This is reminiscent of the epistemological slide from cultural or individual relativity of some observed things, to a huge metaphysical denial of truth. Bach's warning applies to me, as I have been drifting down his slope lately. Nice.
The
21 ideas
from 'What Does It Take to Refer?'
10440
|
An object can be described without being referred to
[Bach]
|
10439
|
What refers: indefinite or definite or demonstrative descriptions, names, indexicals, demonstratives?
[Bach]
|
10441
|
If we can refer to things which change, we can't be obliged to single out their properties
[Bach]
|
10446
|
Fictional reference is different inside and outside the fiction
[Bach]
|
10447
|
We can refer to fictional entities if they are abstract objects
[Bach]
|
10442
|
We can think of an individual without have a uniquely characterizing description
[Bach]
|
10443
|
You 'allude to', not 'refer to', an individual if you keep their identity vague
[Bach]
|
10444
|
Definite descriptions can be used to refer, but are not semantically referential
[Bach]
|
10445
|
It can't be real reference if it could refer to some other thing that satisfies the description
[Bach]
|
10455
|
Free logic at least allows empty names, but struggles to express non-existence
[Bach]
|
10453
|
In logic constants play the role of proper names
[Bach]
|
10454
|
In first-order we can't just assert existence, and it is very hard to deny something's existence
[Bach]
|
10456
|
Millian names struggle with existence, empty names, identities and attitude ascription
[Bach]
|
10452
|
Proper names can be non-referential - even predicate as well as attributive uses
[Bach]
|
10457
|
Since most expressions can be used non-referentially, none of them are inherently referential
[Bach]
|
10459
|
Context does not create reference; it is just something speakers can exploit
[Bach]
|
10460
|
'That duck' may not refer to the most obvious one in the group
[Bach]
|
10458
|
People slide from contextual variability all the way to contextual determination
[Bach]
|
10461
|
What a pronoun like 'he' refers back to is usually a matter of speaker's intentions
[Bach]
|
10462
|
Information comes from knowing who is speaking, not just from interpretation of the utterance
[Bach]
|
10463
|
Just alluding to or describing an object is not the same as referring to it
[Bach]
|