more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10461

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 5. Speaker's Reference ]

Full Idea

To illustrate speakers' intentions, consider the anaphoric reference using pronouns in these: "A cop arrested a robber; he was wearing a badge", and "A cop arrested a robber; he was wearing a mask". The natural supposition is not the inevitable one.

Clarification

'Anaphora' refers back to something earlier in the sentence

Gist of Idea

What a pronoun like 'he' refers back to is usually a matter of speaker's intentions

Source

Kent Bach (What Does It Take to Refer? [2006], 22.2 L4)

Book Ref

'Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language', ed/tr. Lepore,E/Smith,B [OUP 2008], p.546


A Reaction

I am a convert to speakers' intentions as the source of all reference, and this example seems to illustrate it very well. 'He said..' 'Who said?'


The 12 ideas with the same theme [reference fixed by what the speaker intends]:

I may regard a thought about Phosphorus as true, and the same thought about Hesperus as false [Frege]
Russell assumes that expressions refer, but actually speakers refer by using expressions [Cooper,DE on Russell]
Expressions don't refer; people use expressions to refer [Strawson,P]
If an utterance fails to refer then it is a pseudo-use, though a speaker may think they assert something [Strawson,P]
Whether a definite description is referential or attributive depends on the speaker's intention [Donnellan]
Context does not create reference; it is just something speakers can exploit [Bach]
'That duck' may not refer to the most obvious one in the group [Bach]
What a pronoun like 'he' refers back to is usually a matter of speaker's intentions [Bach]
Information comes from knowing who is speaking, not just from interpretation of the utterance [Bach]
Even a quantifier like 'someone' can be used referentially [Sainsbury]
Because some entities overlap, reference must have analytic individuation principles [Sidelle]
No language is semantically referential; it all occurs at the level of thought or utterance [Pietroski, by Hofweber]