more on this theme     |     more from this thinker

Single Idea 10543

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 2. Abstract Objects / c. Modern abstracta ]

Full Idea

For an object to be abstract, we require only that an understanding of any name of that object involves a recognition that the object is in the range of some functional expression.

Gist of Idea

Abstract objects must have names that fall within the range of some functional expression

Source

Michael Dummett (Frege Philosophy of Language (2nd ed) [1973], Ch.14)

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Frege Philosophy of Language' [Duckworth 1981], p.485

A Reaction

I'm not sure I understand this, but a function must involve a relation between some objects, such that a unique object is consequently picked out.

The 23 ideas from 'Frege Philosophy of Language (2nd ed)'

10320 If a genuine singular term needs a criterion of identity, we must exclude abstract nouns [Dummett, by Hale]
19168 Concepts only have a 'functional character', because they map to truth values, not objects [Dummett, by Davidson]
10549 Since abstract objects cannot be picked out, we must rely on identity statements [Dummett]
10516 A realistic view of reference is possible for concrete objects, but not for abstract objects [Dummett, by Hale]
10547 Abstract objects can never be confronted, and need verbal phrases for reference [Dummett]
10531 There is a modern philosophical notion of 'object', first introduced by Frege [Dummett]
17621 What matters in mathematics is its objectivity, not the existence of the objects [Dummett]
10537 The ordered pairs <x,y> can be reduced to the class of sets of the form {{x},{x,y}} [Dummett]
10542 To associate a cardinal with each set, we need the Axiom of Choice to find a representative [Dummett]
10554 Intuitionists find the Incompleteness Theorem unsurprising, since proof is intuitive, not formal [Dummett]
10540 We can't say that light is concrete but radio waves abstract [Dummett]
10552 Intuitionism says that totality of numbers is only potential, but is still determinate [Dummett]
10515 Ostension is possible for concreta; abstracta can only be referred to via other objects [Dummett, by Hale]
10544 The concrete/abstract distinction seems crude: in which category is the Mistral? [Dummett]
10546 We don't need a sharp concrete/abstract distinction [Dummett]
10548 The context principle for names rules out a special philosophical sense for 'existence' [Dummett]
10281 The objects we recognise the world as containing depends on the structure of our language [Dummett]
10532 We can understand universals by studying predication [Dummett]
10534 'Nominalism' used to mean denial of universals, but now means denial of abstract objects [Dummett]
10545 Abstract objects may not cause changes, but they can be the subject of change [Dummett]
10541 Concrete objects such as sounds and smells may not be possible objects of ostension [Dummett]
10555 If we can intuitively apprehend abstract objects, this makes them observable and causally active [Dummett]
10543 Abstract objects must have names that fall within the range of some functional expression [Dummett]