more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 10676

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / j. Axiom of Choice IX ]

Full Idea

The Axiom of Choice seems better treated as a non-logical principle of set-theory.

Gist of Idea

The Axiom of Choice is a non-logical principle of set-theory

Source

Keith Hossack (Plurals and Complexes [2000], 4 n8)

Book Ref

-: 'British Soc for the Philosophy of Science' [-], p.421


A Reaction

This reinforces the idea that set theory is not part of logic (and so pure logicism had better not depend on set theory).


The 21 ideas from 'Plurals and Complexes'

Plural reference will refer to complex facts without postulating complex things [Hossack]
Complex particulars are either masses, or composites, or sets [Hossack]
Leibniz's Law argues against atomism - water is wet, unlike water molecules [Hossack]
A thought can refer to many things, but only predicate a universal and affirm a state of affairs [Hossack]
Plural reference is just an abbreviation when properties are distributive, but not otherwise [Hossack]
We are committed to a 'group' of children, if they are sitting in a circle [Hossack]
Plural definite descriptions pick out the largest class of things that fit the description [Hossack]
A plural comprehension principle says there are some things one of which meets some condition [Hossack]
Plural language can discuss without inconsistency things that are not members of themselves [Hossack]
A plural language gives a single comprehensive induction axiom for arithmetic [Hossack]
The Axiom of Choice is a non-logical principle of set-theory [Hossack]
Extensional mereology needs two definitions and two axioms [Hossack]
The relation of composition is indispensable to the part-whole relation for individuals [Hossack]
In arithmetic singularists need sets as the instantiator of numeric properties [Hossack]
The fusion of five rectangles can decompose into more than five parts that are rectangles [Hossack]
The theory of the transfinite needs the ordinal numbers [Hossack]
I take the real numbers to be just lengths [Hossack]
We could ignore space, and just talk of the shape of matter [Hossack]
Set theory is the science of infinity [Hossack]
The Axiom of Choice guarantees a one-one correspondence from sets to ordinals [Hossack]
Maybe we reduce sets to ordinals, rather than the other way round [Hossack]