more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10683

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / C. Space / 2. Space ]

Full Idea

We might dispense with substantival space, and say that if the distribution of matter in space could have been different, that just means the matter of the Universe could have been shaped differently (with geometry as the science of shapes).

Gist of Idea

We could ignore space, and just talk of the shape of matter

Source

Keith Hossack (Plurals and Complexes [2000], 9)

Book Ref

-: 'British Soc for the Philosophy of Science' [-], p.432


The 12 ideas with the same theme [general ideas about space]:

Space is the order of coexisting possibles [Leibniz]
We can't learn of space through experience; experience of space needs its representation [Kant]
Space is an a priori necessary basic intuition, as we cannot imagine its absence [Kant]
Space must have three dimensions, because only three lines can meet at right angles [Kant]
Unlike time, space is subjective. Empty space was assumed, but it doesn't exist [Nietzsche]
There is 'private space', and there is also the 'space of perspectives' [Russell]
Six dimensions are needed for a particular, three within its own space, and three to locate that space [Russell]
Space can't be an individual (in space), but it is present in all places [Harré/Madden]
Empty space contains a continual flux of brief virtual particles [Krauss]
If space is really just a force-field, then it is a physical entity [Burgess/Rosen]
We could ignore space, and just talk of the shape of matter [Hossack]
Hilbert Space is an abstraction representing all possible states of a quantum system [New Sci.]