more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10704

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / A. Overview of Logic / 7. Second-Order Logic ]

Full Idea

In second-order logic only the formation rules are completely formalizable, not the inference rules.

Gist of Idea

We can formalize second-order formation rules, but not inference rules

Source

Michael Potter (Set Theory and Its Philosophy [2004], 01.2)

Book Ref

Potter,Michael: 'Set Theory and Its Philosophy' [OUP 2004], p.13


A Reaction

He cites Gödel's First Incompleteness theorem for this.


The 31 ideas from Michael Potter

Traditionally there are twelve categories of judgement, in groups of three [Potter]
Frege's sign |--- meant judgements, but the modern |- turnstile means inference, with intecedents [Potter]
A material conditional cannot capture counterfactual reasoning [Potter]
Compositionality should rely on the parsing tree, which may contain more than sentence components [Potter]
'Direct compositonality' says the components wholly explain a sentence meaning [Potter]
'Greater than', which is the ancestral of 'successor', strictly orders the natural numbers [Potter]
Impredicative definitions are circular, but fine for picking out, rather than creating something [Potter]
Deductivism can't explain how the world supports unconditional conclusions [Potter]
If 'concrete' is the negative of 'abstract', that means desires and hallucinations are concrete [Potter]
The phrase 'the concept "horse"' can't refer to a concept, because it is saturated [Potter]
Modern logical truths are true under all interpretations of the non-logical words [Potter]
Compositionality is more welcome in logic than in linguistics (which is more contextual) [Potter]
Why is fictional arithmetic applicable to the real world? [Potter]
The Identity Theory says a proposition is true if it coincides with what makes it true [Potter]
The formalist defence against Gödel is to reject his metalinguistic concept of truth [Potter]
It has been unfortunate that externalism about truth is equated with correspondence [Potter]
Knowledge from a drunken schoolteacher is from a reliable and unreliable process [Potter]
Set theory's three roles: taming the infinite, subject-matter of mathematics, and modes of reasoning [Potter]
Supposing axioms (rather than accepting them) give truths, but they are conditional [Potter]
We can formalize second-order formation rules, but not inference rules [Potter]
Mereology elides the distinction between the cards in a pack and the suits [Potter]
Collections have fixed members, but fusions can be carved in innumerable ways [Potter]
Nowadays we derive our conception of collections from the dependence between them [Potter]
Priority is a modality, arising from collections and members [Potter]
If dependence is well-founded, with no infinite backward chains, this implies substances [Potter]
If set theory didn't found mathematics, it is still needed to count infinite sets [Potter]
Usually the only reason given for accepting the empty set is convenience [Potter]
A relation is a set consisting entirely of ordered pairs [Potter]
Infinity: There is at least one limit level [Potter]
It is remarkable that all natural number arithmetic derives from just the Peano Axioms [Potter]
The 'limitation of size' principles say whether properties collectivise depends on the number of objects [Potter]