more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10775

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / j. Axiom of Choice IX ]

Full Idea

The main objection to the axiom of choice was that it had to be given by some law or definition, but since sets are arbitrary this seems irrelevant. Formalists consider it meaningless, but set-theorists consider it as true, and practically obvious.

Gist of Idea

The axiom of choice now seems acceptable and obvious (if it is meaningful)

Source

Leslie H. Tharp (Which Logic is the Right Logic? [1975], §3)

Book Ref

'Philosophy of Logic: an anthology', ed/tr. Jacquette,Dale [Blackwell 2002], p.40


The 16 ideas from Leslie H. Tharp

In sentential logic there is a simple proof that all truth functions can be reduced to 'not' and 'and' [Tharp]
Completeness and compactness together give axiomatizability [Tharp]
If completeness fails there is no algorithm to list the valid formulas [Tharp]
Compactness is important for major theories which have infinitely many axioms [Tharp]
Compactness blocks infinite expansion, and admits non-standard models [Tharp]
A complete logic has an effective enumeration of the valid formulas [Tharp]
Effective enumeration might be proved but not specified, so it won't guarantee knowledge [Tharp]
Soundness would seem to be an essential requirement of a proof procedure [Tharp]
The Löwenheim-Skolem property is a limitation (e.g. can't say there are uncountably many reals) [Tharp]
Logic is either for demonstration, or for characterizing structures [Tharp]
Elementary logic is complete, but cannot capture mathematics [Tharp]
Second-order logic isn't provable, but will express set-theory and classic problems [Tharp]
The axiom of choice now seems acceptable and obvious (if it is meaningful) [Tharp]
There are at least five unorthodox quantifiers that could be used [Tharp]
The main quantifiers extend 'and' and 'or' to infinite domains [Tharp]
Skolem mistakenly inferred that Cantor's conceptions were illusory [Tharp]