more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 10786
[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / a. Names
]
Full Idea
The tendency has been to call any expression a 'name', however distant from the grammatical category of nouns, provided it is seen as referring.
Gist of Idea
Anything which refers tends to be called a 'name', even if it isn't a noun
Source
Ruth Barcan Marcus (Nominalism and Substitutional Quantifiers [1978], p.162)
Book Ref
'Philosophy of Logic: an anthology', ed/tr. Jacquette,Dale [Blackwell 2002], p.162
The
13 ideas
from 'Nominalism and Substitutional Quantifiers'
10785
|
Maybe a substitutional semantics for quantification lends itself to nominalism
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10786
|
Anything which refers tends to be called a 'name', even if it isn't a noun
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10788
|
Nominalists see proper names as a main vehicle of reference
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10787
|
Is being just referent of the verb 'to be'?
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10789
|
Nominalists say predication is relations between individuals, or deny that it refers
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10790
|
Quantifiers are needed to refer to infinitely many objects
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10791
|
Substitutional semantics has no domain of objects, but place-markers for substitutions
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10796
|
If objects are thoughts, aren't we back to psychologism?
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10795
|
Substitutional language has no ontology, and is just a way of speaking
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10794
|
The nominalist is tied by standard semantics to first-order, denying higher-order abstracta
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10798
|
A true universal sentence might be substitutionally refuted, by an unnamed denumerable object
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10797
|
Substitutivity won't fix identity, because expressions may be substitutable, but not refer at all
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|
10799
|
Nominalists should quantify existentially at first-order, and substitutionally when higher
[Marcus (Barcan)]
|