more on this theme     |     more from this text

Single Idea 10919

[filed under theme 9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / c. Wholes from parts ]

Full Idea

What is it in this stone, by which ...it is absolutely incompatible with the stone for it to be divided into several parts each of which is this stone, the kind of division that is proper to a universal whole as divided into its subjective parts?

Gist of Idea

What prevents a stone from being divided into parts which are still the stone?

Source

John Duns Scotus (Ordinatio [1302], II d3 p1 q2 n48)

A Reaction

This is the origin of the concept of haecceity, when Scotus wants to know what exactly individuates each separate entity. He may have been mistaken in thinking that such a question has an answer.

The 24 ideas from John Duns Scotus

16626 Substance is only grasped under the general heading of 'being' [Duns Scotus]
16660 Are things distinct if they are both separate, or if only one of them can be separate? [Duns Scotus, by Pasnau]
16776 Substance is an intrinsic thing, so parts of substances can't also be intrinsic things [Duns Scotus]
16650 'Unity' is a particularly difficult word, because things can have hidden unity [Duns Scotus]
13094 The haecceity is the featureless thing which gives ultimate individuality to a substance [Duns Scotus, by Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
15386 If only the singular exists, science is impossible, as that relies on true generalities [Duns Scotus, by Panaccio]
15387 If things were singular they would only differ numerically, but horse and tulip differ more than that [Duns Scotus, by Panaccio]
10919 What prevents a stone from being divided into parts which are still the stone? [Duns Scotus]
16770 It is absurd that there is no difference between a genuinely unified thing, and a mere aggregate [Duns Scotus]
16632 We distinguish one thing from another by contradiction, because this is, and that is not [Duns Scotus]
16768 Two things are different if something is true of one and not of the other [Duns Scotus]
16648 Accidents must have formal being, if they are principles of real action, and of mental action and thought [Duns Scotus]
16614 Matter and form give true unity; subject and accident is just unity 'per accidens' [Duns Scotus]
22125 Duns Scotus was a realist about universals [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22127 Scotus said a substantial principle of individuation [haecceitas] was needed for an essence [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22128 Augustine's 'illumination' theory of knowledge leads to nothing but scepticism [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22121 The concept of being has only one meaning, whether talking of universals or of God [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22122 Being (not sensation or God) is the primary object of the intellect [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22129 Certainty comes from the self-evident, from induction, and from self-awareness [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22130 Scotus defended direct 'intuitive cognition', against the abstractive view [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22131 The will retains its power for opposites, even when it is acting [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22123 The concept of God is the unique first efficient cause, final cause, and most eminent being [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22124 We can't infer the infinity of God from creation ex nihilo [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
22126 Avicenna and Duns Scotus say essences have independent and prior existence [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]