more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 10944

[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 4. Real Definition ]

Full Idea

We can assign a term to any 'account' whatever, so that the Iliad would be a definition! No, a definition must be of something primary.

Gist of Idea

A definition must be of something primary

Source

Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 1030a08)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Metaphysics', ed/tr. Lawson-Tancred,Hugh [Penguin 1998], p.180

A Reaction

At first hearing you may doubt this claim, but Aristotle's example clinches it beautifully. Are you really going to say that The Iliad is the definition of 'Iliad'?

The 25 ideas with the same theme [give the true nature of something, not just a description]:

15854 A primary element has only a name, and no logos, but complexes have an account, by weaving the names [Plato]
10944 A definition must be of something primary [Aristotle]
596 Only substance [ousias] admits of definition [Aristotle]
12360 Definitions need the complex features of form, and don't need to mention the category [Aristotle, by Wedin]
16107 Sometimes parts must be mentioned in definitions of essence, and sometimes not [Aristotle]
12145 Definitions are of what something is, and that is universal [Aristotle]
12384 Definition by division needs predicates, which are well ordered and thorough [Aristotle]
9066 You can define objects by progressively identifying what is the same and what is different [Aristotle]
12075 An Aristotelian definition is causal [Aristotle, by Witt]
8200 Aristotelian definitions aim to give the essential properties of the thing defined [Aristotle, by Quine]
15957 Essential definitions show the differences that discriminate things, and make them what they are [Boyle]
12976 If our ideas of a thing are imperfect, the thing can have several unconnected definitions [Leibniz]
12984 Real definitions, unlike nominal definitions, display possibilities [Leibniz]
12982 One essence can be expressed by several definitions [Leibniz]
12915 Definitions can only be real if the item is possible [Leibniz]
11920 A real definition gives all the properties that constitute an identity [Molnar]
11217 Chemists aim at real definition of things; lexicographers aim at nominal definition of usage [Gupta]
12302 Definitions formed an abstract hierarchy for Aristotle, as sets do for us [Fine,K]
11157 Modern philosophy has largely abandoned real definitions, apart from sortals [Fine,K]
14259 Maybe two objects might require simultaneous real definitions, as with two simultaneous terms [Fine,K]
9959 'Real' definitions give the essential properties of things under a concept [Mautner]
9376 A sentence may simultaneously define a term, and also assert a fact [Boghossian]
15118 A successful Aristotelian 'definition' is what sciences produces after an investigation [Koslicki]
17311 Real definitions don't just single out a thing; they must also explain its essence [Koslicki]
16030 'Nominal' definitions identify things, but fail to give their essence [Jones,J-E]