more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11005

[filed under theme 19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 4. Compositionality ]

Full Idea

A problem with compositionality is negative existential propositions. If some of the terms of the proposition are empty, and don't refer, then compositionality implies that the whole will lack meaning too.

Gist of Idea

Negative existentials with compositionality make the whole sentence meaningless

Source

Stephen Read (Thinking About Logic [1995], Ch.5)

Book Ref

Read,Stephen: 'Thinking About Logic' [OUP 1995], p.123


A Reaction

I don't agree. I don't see why compositionality implies holism about sentence-meaning. If I say 'that circular square is a psychopath', you understand the predication, despite being puzzled by the singular term.


The 16 ideas with the same theme [sentence meaning as built up from its components]:

Frege's account was top-down and decompositional, not bottom-up and compositional [Frege, by Potter]
Propositions are understood via their constituents [Wittgenstein]
Propositions use old expressions for a new sense [Wittgenstein]
Compositionality explains how long sentences work, and truth conditions are the main compositional feature [Davidson, by Lycan]
If you assign semantics to sentence parts, the sentence fails to compose a whole [Davidson]
Encountering novel sentences shows conclusively that meaning must be compositional [Peacocke]
The content of an assertion can be quite different from compositional content [Yablo]
Negative existentials with compositionality make the whole sentence meaningless [Read]
Compositonality is a way to build up the truth-conditions of a sentence [Hofweber]
Compositionality should rely on the parsing tree, which may contain more than sentence components [Potter]
'Direct compositonality' says the components wholly explain a sentence meaning [Potter]
Compositionality is more welcome in logic than in linguistics (which is more contextual) [Potter]
Weaker compositionality says meaningful well-formed sentences get the meaning from the parts [Magidor]
Strong compositionality says meaningful expressions syntactically well-formed are meaningful [Magidor]
Understanding unlimited numbers of sentences suggests that meaning is compositional [Magidor]
Semantic theories show how truth of sentences depends on rules for interpreting and joining their parts [Schroeter]