more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11076

[filed under theme 19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 6. Truth-Conditions Semantics ]

Full Idea

If we take account of the fact that a speaker is in a community, then we must adopt an assertability-conditions semantics (based on what is legitimately assertible), and reject truth-conditional semantics (based on correspondence to the facts).

Gist of Idea

Community implies assertability-conditions rather than truth-conditions semantics

Source

report of Saul A. Kripke (Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language [1982]) by Robert Hanna - Rationality and Logic 6.1

Book Ref

Hanna,Robert: 'Rationality and Logic' [MIT 2006], p.163


A Reaction

[Part of Hanna's full summary of Kripke's argument] This sounds wrong to me. There are conditions where it is agreed that a lie should be told. Two people can be guilty of the same malapropism.


The 15 ideas with the same theme [giving meaning by specifying how sentences would be true]:

The theory of definite descriptions aims at finding correct truth conditions [Russell, by Lycan]
Truth-condition theorists must argue use can only be described by appeal to conditions of truth [Dummett]
The truth-conditions theory must get agreement on a conception of truth [Dummett]
Davidson's theory of meaning focuses not on terms, but on relations between sentences [Rorty]
Top-down semantic analysis must begin with truth, as it is obvious, and explains linguistic usage [Davidson]
Community implies assertability-conditions rather than truth-conditions semantics [Kripke, by Hanna]
I can understand "He has a beard", without identifying 'he', and hence the truth conditions [Jackson]
Truth in a language is explained by how the structural elements of a sentence contribute to its truth conditions [Harman]
To understand an utterance, you must understand what the world would be like if it is true [Stalnaker]
Externalist semantics are necessary to connect the contents of beliefs with how the world is [Fodor]
Semantic content is a proposition made of sentence constituents (not some set of circumstances) [Soames]
There is information if there are symbols which refer, and which can combine into a truth or falsehood [McGinn]
Truth conditions will come out the same for sentences with 'renate' or 'cordate' [Lycan]
Truth-conditions as subject-matter has problems of relevance, short cut, and reversal [Yablo]
If truth is deflationary, sentence truth-conditions just need good declarative syntax [Miller,A]