more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
We must not leap to the fatalistic conclusion that we are stuck with the conceptual scheme that we grew up in. We can change it bit by bit, plank by plank.
Gist of Idea
We aren't stuck with our native conceptual scheme; we can gradually change it
Source
Willard Quine (Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis [1950], 5)
Book Ref
Quine,Willard: 'From a Logical Point of View' [Harper and Row 1963], p.78
A Reaction
This is an interesting commitment to Strawson's 'revisionary' metaphysics, rather than its duller cousin 'descriptive' metaphysics. Good for Quine. Remember, though, Davidson's 'On the Very Idea of Conceptual Scheme'.
11092 | A river is a process, with stages; if we consider it as one thing, we are considering a process [Quine] |
17595 | To unite a sequence of ostensions to make one object, a prior concept of identity is needed [Quine] |
11095 | We should just identify any items which are indiscernible within a given discourse [Quine] |
11093 | We don't say 'red' is abstract, unlike a river, just because it has discontinuous shape [Quine] |
11096 | Discourse generally departmentalizes itself to some degree [Quine] |
11094 | 'Red' is a single concrete object in space-time; 'red' and 'drop' are parts of a red drop [Quine] |
11097 | Red is the largest red thing in the universe [Quine] |
11101 | General terms don't commit us ontologically, but singular terms with substitution do [Quine] |
11099 | Understanding 'is square' is knowing when to apply it, not knowing some object [Quine] |
11103 | We aren't stuck with our native conceptual scheme; we can gradually change it [Quine] |
11104 | Concepts are language [Quine] |
11102 | Apply '-ness' or 'class of' to abstract general terms, to get second-level abstract singular terms [Quine] |