more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 11166
[filed under theme 10. Modality / C. Sources of Modality / 1. Sources of Necessity
]
Full Idea
We naturally suppose, if a subject-predicate proposition is necessary, that the subject of the proposition is the source of the necessity. But that singleton 2 contains 2 is necessary, whether the number or the set is the subject of the proposition.
Gist of Idea
The subject of a proposition need not be the source of its necessity
Source
Kit Fine (Essence and Modality [1994], p. 9)
Book Ref
-: 'Philosophical Perspectives' [-], p.9
A Reaction
A very nice addition to his general attack on the idea that essence should be accounted for in terms of his necessity. He asks a beautifully simple question: for each necessity that we accept, what is the source of that necessity?
The
28 ideas
with the same theme
[general views on what gives rise to necessity]:
4822
|
Divine nature makes all existence and operations necessary, and nothing is contingent
[Spinoza]
|
6181
|
Necessity cannot be extracted from an empirical proposition
[Kant]
|
4192
|
All necessity arises from causation, which is conditioned; there is no absolute or unconditioned necessity
[Schopenhauer]
|
4743
|
The truth-maker for a truth must necessitate that truth
[Armstrong]
|
12687
|
Metaphysical necessities are those depending on the essential nature of things
[Ellis]
|
16984
|
I don't think possible worlds reductively reveal the natures of modal operators etc.
[Kripke]
|
3867
|
De re necessity arises from the way the world is
[Newton-Smith]
|
14629
|
If we are told the source of necessity, this seems to be a regress if the source is not already necessary
[Blackburn]
|
14529
|
If something underlies a necessity, is that underlying thing necessary or contingent?
[Blackburn, by Hale/Hoffmann,A]
|
12187
|
Objectual modal realists believe in possible worlds; non-objectual ones rest it on the actual world
[McFetridge]
|
13374
|
To analyse modality, we must give accounts of objects, properties and relations
[Jubien]
|
13391
|
Modality concerns relations among platonic properties
[Jubien]
|
11166
|
The subject of a proposition need not be the source of its necessity
[Fine,K]
|
17273
|
Each basic modality has its 'own' explanatory relation
[Fine,K]
|
17289
|
Every necessary truth is grounded in the nature of something
[Fine,K]
|
14530
|
The role of semantic necessity in semantics is like metaphysical necessity in metaphysics
[Fine,K, by Hale/Hoffmann,A]
|
9216
|
Each area of enquiry, and its source, has its own distinctive type of necessity
[Fine,K]
|
14531
|
Rather than define counterfactuals using necessity, maybe necessity is a special case of counterfactuals
[Williamson, by Hale/Hoffmann,A]
|
19282
|
It seems that we cannot show that modal facts depend on non-modal facts
[Hale]
|
12432
|
Explanation of necessity must rest on something necessary or something contingent
[Hale]
|
12434
|
Why is this necessary, and what is necessity in general; why is this necessary truth true, and why necessary?
[Hale]
|
12435
|
The explanation of a necessity can be by a truth (which may only happen to be a necessary truth)
[Hale]
|
15030
|
Humeans say that we decide what is necessary
[Sider]
|
15031
|
Modal terms in English are entirely contextual, with no modality outside the language
[Sider]
|
14101
|
Are necessary truths rooted in essences, or also in basic grounding laws?
[Rosen]
|
15103
|
Blackburn fails to show that the necessary cannot be grounded in the contingent
[Cameron]
|
14372
|
Possible worlds are just not suitable truthmakers for modality
[Jacobs]
|
14549
|
Maybe truths are necessitated by the facts which are their truthmakers
[Mumford/Anjum]
|