more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11961

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / c. Counterfactual causation ]

Full Idea

The counterfactual analysis is open to the Euthyphro objection: it is causal dependence that explains any counterfactual dependence rather than vice versa.

Clarification

See Idea 336 for the Euthyphro objection (i.e. which comes first?)

Gist of Idea

Causal dependence explains counterfactual dependence, not vice versa

Source

George Molnar (Powers [1998], 12.1)

Book Ref

Molnar,George: 'Powers: a study in metaphysics', ed/tr. Mumford,Stephen [OUP 2003], p.187


A Reaction

I take views like the counterfactual analysis of causation to arise from empiricists who are bizarrely reluctant to adopt plausible best explainations (such as powers and essences).

Related Idea

Idea 336 Is what is pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because they love it? (the 'Euthyphro Question') [Plato]


The 38 ideas from George Molnar

Substantive metaphysics says what a property is, not what a predicate means [Molnar]
Platonic explanations of universals actually diminish our understanding [Molnar]
For nominalists, predicate extensions are inexplicable facts [Molnar]
If atomism is true, then all properties derive from ultimate properties [Molnar]
'Being physical' is a second-order property [Molnar]
Structural properties are derivate properties [Molnar]
The essence of a thing need not include everything that is necessarily true of it [Molnar]
Ontological dependence rests on essential connection, not necessary connection [Molnar]
A real definition gives all the properties that constitute an identity [Molnar]
Reflexive relations are syntactically polyadic but ontologically monadic [Molnar]
The laws of nature depend on the powers, not the other way round [Molnar]
Are tropes transferable? If they are, that is a version of Platonism [Molnar]
'Categorical properties' are those which are not powers [Molnar]
It is contingent which kinds and powers exist in the world [Molnar]
Science works when we assume natural kinds have essences - because it is true [Molnar]
Singular causation is prior to general causation; each aspirin produces the aspirin generalization [Molnar]
Causal dependence explains counterfactual dependence, not vice versa [Molnar]
Nominalists only accept first-order logic [Molnar]
What is the truthmaker for a non-existent possible? [Molnar]
Location in space and time are non-power properties [Molnar, by Mumford]
The three categories in ontology are objects, properties and relations [Molnar]
One essential property of a muon doesn't entail the others [Molnar]
Energy fields are discontinuous at the very small [Molnar]
Powers have Directedness, Independence, Actuality, Intrinsicality and Objectivity [Molnar]
A power's type-identity is given by its definitive manifestation [Molnar]
The physical world has a feature very like mental intentionality [Molnar]
Physical powers like solubility and charge also have directedness [Molnar]
The two ways proposed to distinguish mind are intentionality or consciousness [Molnar]
We should analyse causation in terms of powers, not vice versa [Molnar]
If powers only exist when actual, they seem to be nomadic, and indistinguishable from non-powers [Molnar]
Dispositions can be causes, so they must be part of the actual world [Molnar]
Rule occasionalism says God's actions follow laws, not miracles [Molnar]
Dispositions and external powers arise entirely from intrinsic powers in objects [Molnar]
Hume allows interpolation, even though it and extrapolation are not actually valid [Molnar]
The Standard Model suggest that particles are entirely dispositional, and hence are powers [Molnar]
Some powers are ungrounded, and others rest on them, and are derivative [Molnar]
We should analyse causation in terms of powers [Molnar]
There are no 'structural properties', as properties with parts [Molnar]