more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11989

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 2. Descriptions / c. Theory of definite descriptions ]

Full Idea

It is a tenet of Russell's theory that all expressions, and especially definite descriptions, whose denotation is dependent upon contingent circumstances must be eliminated.

Gist of Idea

For Russell, expressions dependent on contingent circumstances must be eliminated

Source

David Kaplan (How to Russell a Frege-Church [1975], II)

Book Ref

'The Possible and the Actual', ed/tr. Loux,Michael J. [Cornell 1979], p.214


The 13 ideas from David Kaplan

Indexicals have a 'character' (the standing meaning), and a 'content' (truth-conditions for one context) [Kaplan, by Macià/Garcia-Carpentiro]
'Content' gives the standard modal profile, and 'character' gives rules for a context [Kaplan, by Schroeter]
Are causal descriptions part of the causal theory of reference, or are they just metasemantic? [Kaplan, by Schaffer,J]
For Russell, expressions dependent on contingent circumstances must be eliminated [Kaplan]
'Haecceitism' says that sameness or difference of individuals is independent of appearances [Kaplan]
'Haecceitism' is common thisness under dissimilarity, or distinct thisnesses under resemblance [Kaplan]
If quantification into modal contexts is legitimate, that seems to imply some form of haecceitism [Kaplan]
Unusual people may have no counterparts, or several [Kaplan]
Essence is a transworld heir line, rather than a collection of properties [Kaplan]
Sentences might have the same sense when logically equivalent - or never have the same sense [Kaplan]
Models nicely separate particulars from their clothing, and logicians often accept that metaphysically [Kaplan]
Logicians like their entities to exhibit a maximum degree of purity [Kaplan]
The simplest solution to transworld identification is to adopt bare particulars [Kaplan]