more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11991

[filed under theme 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / d. Haecceitism ]

Full Idea

If one regards the usual form of quantification into modal and other intensional contexts - modality de re - as legitimate (without special explanations), then one seems committed to some form of haecceitism.

Gist of Idea

If quantification into modal contexts is legitimate, that seems to imply some form of haecceitism

Source

David Kaplan (How to Russell a Frege-Church [1975], IV)

Book Ref

'The Possible and the Actual', ed/tr. Loux,Michael J. [Cornell 1979], p.219


A Reaction

That is, modal reference requires fixed identities, irrespective of possible changes in properties. Why could one not refer to objects just as bundles of properties, with some sort of rules about when it ceased to be that particular bundle (keep 60%?)?


The 13 ideas from David Kaplan

Indexicals have a 'character' (the standing meaning), and a 'content' (truth-conditions for one context) [Kaplan, by Macià/Garcia-Carpentiro]
'Content' gives the standard modal profile, and 'character' gives rules for a context [Kaplan, by Schroeter]
Are causal descriptions part of the causal theory of reference, or are they just metasemantic? [Kaplan, by Schaffer,J]
For Russell, expressions dependent on contingent circumstances must be eliminated [Kaplan]
'Haecceitism' says that sameness or difference of individuals is independent of appearances [Kaplan]
'Haecceitism' is common thisness under dissimilarity, or distinct thisnesses under resemblance [Kaplan]
If quantification into modal contexts is legitimate, that seems to imply some form of haecceitism [Kaplan]
Unusual people may have no counterparts, or several [Kaplan]
Essence is a transworld heir line, rather than a collection of properties [Kaplan]
Sentences might have the same sense when logically equivalent - or never have the same sense [Kaplan]
Models nicely separate particulars from their clothing, and logicians often accept that metaphysically [Kaplan]
Logicians like their entities to exhibit a maximum degree of purity [Kaplan]
The simplest solution to transworld identification is to adopt bare particulars [Kaplan]