more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12053

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / e. Individuation by kind ]

Full Idea

One person can be more or less of a poet than another, so 'poet' is not a conclusory answer to the question 'What is it that is singled out here?' 'Poet' rides on the back of the answer 'human being'.

Gist of Idea

'Human being' is a better answer to 'what is it?' than 'poet', as the latter comes in degrees

Source

David Wiggins (Substance [1995], 4.5.1)

Book Ref

'Philosophy: a Guide Through the Subject', ed/tr. Grayling,A.C. [OUP 1995], p.222


A Reaction

So apparently one must assign a natural kind, and not just a class. Wiggins lacks science fiction imagination. In the genetic salad of the far future, being a poet may be more definitive than being a human being. See Idea 12063.

Related Idea

Idea 12063 Sortal classification becomes science, with cross reference clarifying individuals [Wiggins]


The 14 ideas from 'Substance'

Matter underlies things, composes things, and brings them to be [Wiggins]
We refer to persisting substances, in perception and in thought, and they aid understanding [Wiggins]
An ancestral relation is either direct or transitively indirect [Wiggins]
Sortal predications are answers to the question 'what is x?' [Wiggins]
A river may change constantly, but not in respect of being a river [Wiggins]
Sortal classification becomes science, with cross reference clarifying individuals [Wiggins]
The category of substance is more important for epistemology than for ontology [Wiggins]
Seeing a group of soldiers as an army is irresistible, in ontology and explanation [Wiggins]
Naming the secondary substance provides a mass of general information [Wiggins]
Substances contain a source of change or principle of activity [Wiggins]
We never single out just 'this', but always 'this something-or-other' [Wiggins]
If the kinds are divided realistically, they fall into substances [Wiggins]
'Human being' is a better answer to 'what is it?' than 'poet', as the latter comes in degrees [Wiggins]
Secondary substances correctly divide primary substances by activity-principles and relations [Wiggins]