more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12114

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / G. Scientific Philosophy / 3. Scientism ]

Full Idea

Getting lost in a mass of detail is the weak side of positivism, where partisans of theology and metaphysics may attack with some hope of success. ...We must train scientists who will consider all the different branches of positive science.

Gist of Idea

Science can drown in detail, so we need broad scientists (to keep out the metaphysicians)

Source

Auguste Comte (Intro to Positive Philosophy [1830], Ch.1)

Book Ref

Comte,Auguste: 'Introduction to Positive Philosophy', ed/tr. Ferré,Frederick [Hackett 1988], p.17


A Reaction

This would be Comte's answer now to those who claim there is still a role for metaphysics within the scientific world view. I would say that metaphysics not only takes an overview, but also deals with higher generalisations than Comte's general scientist.


The 13 ideas from 'Intro to Positive Philosophy'

All ideas must be understood historically [Comte]
Our knowledge starts in theology, passes through metaphysics, and ends in positivism [Comte]
Positivism is the final state of human intelligence [Comte]
Metaphysics is just the oversubtle qualification of abstract names for phenomena [Comte]
Positivism gives up absolute truth, and seeks phenomenal laws, by reason and observation [Comte]
Science can drown in detail, so we need broad scientists (to keep out the metaphysicians) [Comte]
Only positivist philosophy can terminate modern social crises [Comte]
All real knowledge rests on observed facts [Comte]
We must observe in order to form theories, but connected observations need prior theories [Comte]
Positivism explains facts by connecting particular phenomena with general facts [Comte]
Introspection is pure illusion; we can obviously observe everything except ourselves [Comte]
The search for first or final causes is futile [Comte]
We can never know origins, purposes or inner natures [Comte]