more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
If a passage carries a reference to love, we are not told what it says about love. And to speak of language with 'reference' but no predication is simply to misuse the word. We leave the realm of representation and enter that of expression.
Gist of Idea
If music refers to love, it contains no predication, so it is expression, not language
Source
Roger Scruton (Representation in Music [1976], p.63-4)
Book Ref
Scruton,Roger: 'The Aesthetic Understanding' [Methuen 1983], p.63
A Reaction
This is a beautifully simple objection to the idea (associated with Nelson Goodman) that art is a language. Though what an 'expression' of something amounts to I am not quite sure.
| 12166 | If music refers to love, it contains no predication, so it is expression, not language [Scruton] |
| 12167 | Reference without predication is the characteristic of expression [Scruton] |
| 12168 | Music is not representational, since thoughts about a subject are never essential to it [Scruton] |