more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12181

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 6. Logical Necessity ]

Full Idea

The traditional crucial assumption is that logical necessity is the strongest notion of necessity. If it is logically necessary that p, then it is necessary that p in any other use of the notion of necessity there may be (physically, practically etc.).

Gist of Idea

Traditionally, logical necessity is the strongest, and entails any other necessities

Source

Ian McFetridge (Logical Necessity: Some Issues [1986], §1)

Book Ref

-: 'Aristotelian Society' [], p.136


A Reaction

Sounds right. We might say it is physically necessary simply because it is logically necessary, and even that it is metaphysically necessary because it is logically necessary (required by logic). Logical possibility is hence the weakest kind?


The 12 ideas from Ian McFetridge

The fundamental case of logical necessity is the valid conclusion of an inference [McFetridge, by Hale]
In the McFetridge view, logical necessity means a consequent must be true if the antecedent is [McFetridge, by Hale]
Logical necessity requires that a valid argument be necessary [McFetridge]
Traditionally, logical necessity is the strongest, and entails any other necessities [McFetridge]
It is only logical necessity if there is absolutely no sense in which it could be false [McFetridge]
We assert epistemic possibility without commitment to logical possibility [McFetridge]
Logical necessity overrules all other necessities [McFetridge]
Objectual modal realists believe in possible worlds; non-objectual ones rest it on the actual world [McFetridge]
Modal realists hold that necessities and possibilities are part of the totality of facts [McFetridge]
The mark of logical necessity is deduction from any suppositions whatever [McFetridge]
We want to know what makes sentences true, rather than defining 'true' [McFetridge]
We normally explain natural events by citing further facts [McFetridge]