more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12210

[filed under theme 7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 1. Ontologies ]

Full Idea

Quine's approach to ontology asks the wrong question, a scientific rather than philosophical question, and answers it in the wrong way, by appealing to philosophical considerations in addition to ordinary scientific considerations.

Gist of Idea

Quine's ontology is wrong; his question is scientific, and his answer is partly philosophical

Source

comment on Willard Quine (On What There Is [1948]) by Kit Fine - The Question of Ontology p.161

Book Ref

'Metametaphysics', ed/tr. Chalmers/Manley/Wasserman [OUP 2009], p.161


A Reaction

He goes on to call Quine's procedure 'cockeyed'. Presumably Quine would reply with bafflement that scientific and philosophical questions could be considered as quite different from one another.


The 15 ideas with the same theme [nature of our theories about fundamental reality]:

Three main questions seem to be whether a thing is, what it is, and what sort it is [Augustine]
Existence questions are 'internal' (within a framework) or 'external' (concerning the whole framework) [Carnap]
Positivists regard ontology as either meaningless or stipulated [Ayer, by Robinson,H]
Quine's ontology is wrong; his question is scientific, and his answer is partly philosophical [Fine,K on Quine]
Ontology is (and always has been) Cantorian mathematics [Badiou]
Ontology is the same as the conceptual foundations of logic [Jacquette]
For ontology we need, not internal or external views, but a view from outside reality [Fine,K]
Ontologists seek existence and identity conditions, and modal and epistemic status for a thing [Swoyer]
'Ontology' means 'study of things which exist' [Maslin]
Existence theories must match experience, possibility, logic and knowledge, and not be self-defeating [Moreland]
Ontology disputes rest on more basic explanation disputes [Haslanger]
A metaphysic is a set of wider explanations derived from a basic ontology [Williams,NE]
Humeans say properties are passive, possibility is vast, laws are descriptions, causation is weak [Williams,NE]
We shouldn't posit the existence of anything we have a word for [Williams,NE]
The status quo is part of what exists, and so needs metaphysical explanation [Williams,NE]