more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12248

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 14. Knowledge of Essences ]

Full Idea

Essentialists fail to show how we ascend from being a property universally possessed, by all kind members, to the status of being an essential property.

Gist of Idea

How can we show that a universally possessed property is an essential property?

Source

Stephen Mumford (Laws in Nature [2004], 07.5)

Book Ref

Mumford,Stephen: 'Laws in Nature' [Routledge 2006], p.117


A Reaction

This is precisely where my proposal comes in - the essential properties, as opposed to the accidentaly universals, are those which explain the nature and behaviour of each kind of thing (and each individual thing).


The 19 ideas with the same theme [how we might know the essence of an object]:

Aristotle claims that the individual is epistemologically prior to the universal [Aristotle, by Witt]
Actual knowledge is of the individual, and potential knowledge of the universal [Aristotle, by Witt]
We only know essences through non-essential features, esp. those closest to the essence [Suárez]
Experience does not teach us any essences of things [Spinoza]
The essence of a triangle is simple; presumably substance essences are similar [Locke]
A space between three lines is both the nominal and real essence of a triangle, the source of its properties [Locke]
The schools recognised that they don't really know essences, because they couldn't coin names for them [Locke]
Essence is the distinct thinkability of anything [Leibniz]
Real cognition grasps a thing from within itself, and is not satisfied with mere predicates [Hegel]
If there are essential properties, how do you find out what they are? [Chisholm]
If essences are objects with only essential properties, they are elusive in possible worlds [Marcus (Barcan)]
Kripke claims that some properties, only knowable posteriori, are known a priori to be essential [Kripke, by Soames]
An essence is the necessary properties, derived from an intuitive identity, in origin, type and material [Kripke, by Witt]
The difficulty in essentialism is deciding the grounds for rating an attribute as essential [Cartwright,R]
If we must know some entity to know an essence, we lack a faculty to do that [Lowe]
Knowing an essence is just knowing what the thing is, not knowing some further thing [Lowe]
How can we show that a universally possessed property is an essential property? [Mumford]
Essentialism comes from the cognitive need to categorise [Gelman]
We found no evidence that mothers teach essentialism to their children [Gelman]