more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12315

[filed under theme 14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / j. Explanations by reduction ]

Full Idea

The powerful engine of my car can be explained by an examination of each of its parts, but it is not caused by them. They do not cause the engine; they constitute it.

Gist of Idea

We can explain by showing constitution, as well as showing causes

Source

Michael Stanford (Explanation: the state of play [1991], p.174)

Book Ref

'Cogito Magazine 05/3', ed/tr. Pyle,Andrew [Carfax 1991], p.174


A Reaction

[example from Ruben 1990:221] This could be challenged, since there is clearly a causal connection between the constitution and the whole. We distinguish engine parts which contribute to the power from those which do not.


The 14 ideas with the same theme [explaining by reveal grounding or foundations]:

We observe qualities, and use 'induction' to refer to the substances lying under them [Gassendi]
Science is the reduction of diverse forces and powers to a smaller number that explain them [Kant]
We have a passion for knowing the parts of something, rather than the whole [James]
You can only explain the qualities of large objects using entities which lack those qualities [Heisenberg]
Six reduction levels: groups, lives, cells, molecules, atoms, particles [Putnam/Oppenheim, by Watson]
Scientific explanation tends to reduce things to the unfamiliar (not the familiar) [Smart]
Solidity comes from the power of repulsion, and shape from the power of attraction [Harré/Madden]
We can explain by showing constitution, as well as showing causes [Stanford]
Reducing one science to another is often said to be the perfect explanation [Ruben]
Reductive explanation is not the be-all and the end-all of explanation [Chalmers]
One form of explanation is by decomposition [Heil]
Grounding is an explanation of truth, and needs all the virtues of good explanations [Fine,K]
Best explanations, especially natural ones, need grounding, notably by persistent objects [Haslanger]
Explanatory reduction is stronger than ontological reduction [Hanna]