more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12446

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / e. Empty names ]

Full Idea

Names function the same way (semantically and grammatically) regardless of whether or not there's an object that they refer to.

Gist of Idea

Names function the same way, even if there is no object

Source

Jody Azzouni (Deflating Existential Consequence [2004], Ch.3 n55)

Book Ref

Azzouni,Jody: 'Deflating Existential Consequence' [OUP 2004], p.79


A Reaction

I take this to be a fairly clear rebuttal of the 'Fido'-Fido view of names (that the meaning of the name IS the dog), which never seems to quite go away. A name is a peg on which description may be hung, seems a good slogan to me.


The 12 ideas from 'Deflating Existential Consequence'

Truth lets us assent to sentences we can't explicitly exhibit [Azzouni]
In the vernacular there is no unequivocal ontological commitment [Azzouni]
Truth is dispensable, by replacing truth claims with the sentence itself [Azzouni]
'Mickey Mouse is a fictional mouse' is true without a truthmaker [Azzouni]
If fictional objects really don't exist, then they aren't abstract objects [Azzouni]
We only get ontology from semantics if we have already smuggled it in [Azzouni]
If objectual quantifiers ontologically commit, so does the metalanguage for its semantics [Azzouni]
Names function the same way, even if there is no object [Azzouni]
Things that don't exist don't have any properties [Azzouni]
That all existents have causal powers is unknowable; the claim is simply an epistemic one [Azzouni]
Modern metaphysics often derives ontology from the logical forms of sentences [Azzouni]
The periodic table not only defines the elements, but also excludes other possible elements [Azzouni]