more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12465

[filed under theme 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 1. Possible Worlds / c. Possible worlds realism ]

Full Idea

Lewis's concrete worlds give a better account of modality (than fictional worlds). When I learn that a man like me drives a truck, I gain evidence for the fact that I can drive a truck.

Gist of Idea

Concrete worlds, unlike fictions, at least offer evidence of how the actual world could be

Source

Jonathan D. Jacobs (A Powers Theory of Modality [2010], §3)

Book Ref

-: 'Philosophical Studies' [-], p.7


A Reaction

Cf. Idea 12464. Jacobs still rightly rejects this as an account of possibility, since the possibility that I might drive a truck must be rooted in me, not in some other person who drives a truck, even if that person is very like me.

Related Idea

Idea 12464 If some book described a possibe life for you, that isn't what makes such a life possible [Jacobs]


The 13 ideas from 'A Powers Theory of Modality'

Unlike correspondence, truthmaking can be one truth to many truthmakers, or vice versa [Jacobs]
We can base counterfactuals on powers, not possible worlds, and hence define necessity [Jacobs]
Concrete worlds, unlike fictions, at least offer evidence of how the actual world could be [Jacobs]
If some book described a possibe life for you, that isn't what makes such a life possible [Jacobs]
Possible worlds are just not suitable truthmakers for modality [Jacobs]
All modality is in the properties and relations of the actual world [Jacobs]
If structures result from intrinsic natures of properties, the 'relations' between them can drop out [Jacobs]
Powers come from concrete particulars, not from the laws of nature [Jacobs]
States of affairs are only possible if some substance could initiate a causal chain to get there [Jacobs]
Possibilities are manifestations of some power, and impossibilies rest on no powers [Jacobs]
Science aims at identifying the structure and nature of the powers that exist [Jacobs]
Possible worlds semantics gives little insight into modality [Jacobs]
Counterfactuals invite us to consider the powers picked out by the antecedent [Jacobs]