more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 12585
[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 13. Against Definition
]
Full Idea
Ordinary speakers are notoriously unsuccessful if asked to offer an explicit definition of the concept 'chair'.
Gist of Idea
Most people can't even define a chair
Source
Christopher Peacocke (A Study of Concepts [1992], 6.1)
Book Ref
Peacocke,Christopher: 'A Study of Concepts' [MIT 1999], p.149
The
13 ideas
from 'A Study of Concepts'
18568
|
Philosophy should merely give necessary and sufficient conditions for concept possession
[Peacocke, by Machery]
|
18571
|
Peacocke's account of possession of a concept depends on one view of counterfactuals
[Peacocke, by Machery]
|
18572
|
Peacocke's account separates psychology from philosophy, and is very sketchy
[Machery on Peacocke]
|
9335
|
Concepts are constituted by their role in a group of propositions to which we are committed
[Peacocke, by Greco]
|
9336
|
A concept's reference is what makes true the beliefs of its possession conditions
[Peacocke, by Horwich]
|
12577
|
Possessing a concept is being able to make judgements which use it
[Peacocke]
|
12578
|
A concept is just what it is to possess that concept
[Peacocke]
|
12581
|
Perceptual concepts causally influence the content of our experiences
[Peacocke]
|
12579
|
Perception has proto-propositions, between immediate experience and concepts
[Peacocke]
|
12584
|
An analysis of concepts must link them to something unconceptualized
[Peacocke]
|
12585
|
Most people can't even define a chair
[Peacocke]
|
12586
|
Consciousness of a belief isn't a belief that one has it
[Peacocke]
|
12587
|
Employing a concept isn't decided by introspection, but by making judgements using it
[Peacocke]
|