more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12585

[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 13. Against Definition ]

Full Idea

Ordinary speakers are notoriously unsuccessful if asked to offer an explicit definition of the concept 'chair'.

Gist of Idea

Most people can't even define a chair

Source

Christopher Peacocke (A Study of Concepts [1992], 6.1)

Book Ref

Peacocke,Christopher: 'A Study of Concepts' [MIT 1999], p.149


The 13 ideas from 'A Study of Concepts'

Philosophy should merely give necessary and sufficient conditions for concept possession [Peacocke, by Machery]
Peacocke's account of possession of a concept depends on one view of counterfactuals [Peacocke, by Machery]
Peacocke's account separates psychology from philosophy, and is very sketchy [Machery on Peacocke]
Concepts are constituted by their role in a group of propositions to which we are committed [Peacocke, by Greco]
A concept's reference is what makes true the beliefs of its possession conditions [Peacocke, by Horwich]
Possessing a concept is being able to make judgements which use it [Peacocke]
A concept is just what it is to possess that concept [Peacocke]
Perceptual concepts causally influence the content of our experiences [Peacocke]
Perception has proto-propositions, between immediate experience and concepts [Peacocke]
An analysis of concepts must link them to something unconceptualized [Peacocke]
Most people can't even define a chair [Peacocke]
Consciousness of a belief isn't a belief that one has it [Peacocke]
Employing a concept isn't decided by introspection, but by making judgements using it [Peacocke]