more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12591

[filed under theme 19. Language / F. Communication / 6. Interpreting Language / a. Translation ]

Full Idea

If one cannot think in a language, one has not yet mastered it. A symbol system used only for communication, like Morse code, is not a language.

Gist of Idea

Mastery of a language requires thinking, and not just communication

Source

Gilbert Harman ((Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics [1987], 12.1.2)

Book Ref

Harman,Gilbert: 'Reasoning Meaning and Mind' [OUP 1999], p.208


A Reaction

This invites the question of someone who has mastered thinking, but has no idea how to communicate. No doubt we might construct a machine with something like that ability. I think it might support Harman's claim.


The 16 ideas from '(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics'

Meaning from use of thoughts, constructed from concepts, which have a role relating to reality [Harman]
Some regard conceptual role semantics as an entirely internal matter [Harman]
Take meaning to be use in calculation with concepts, rather than in communication [Harman]
Mastery of a language requires thinking, and not just communication [Harman]
Concepts in thought have content, but not meaning, which requires communication [Harman]
The use theory attaches meanings to words, not to sentences [Harman]
If one proposition negates the other, which is the negative one? [Harman]
Reasoning aims at increasing explanatory coherence [Harman]
We have a theory of logic (implication and inconsistency), but not of inference or reasoning [Harman]
I might accept P and Q as likely, but reject P-and-Q as unlikely [Harman]
Reality is the overlap of true complete theories [Harman]
Reason conservatively: stick to your beliefs, and prefer reasoning that preserves most of them [Harman]
The way things look is a relational matter, not an intrinsic matter [Harman]
The content of thought is relations, between mental states, things in the world, and contexts [Harman]
There is no natural border between inner and outer [Harman]
We can only describe mental attitudes in relation to the external world [Harman]