more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12600

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 7. Meaning Holism / c. Meaning by Role ]

Full Idea

In (nonsolipsistic) conceptual role semantics the content of thought is not in an 'intrinsic nature', but is rather a matter of how mental states are related to each other, to things in the external world, and to things in a context understood as normal.

Gist of Idea

The content of thought is relations, between mental states, things in the world, and contexts

Source

Gilbert Harman ((Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics [1987], 12.3.3)

Book Ref

Harman,Gilbert: 'Reasoning Meaning and Mind' [OUP 1999], p.221


A Reaction

This is part of Harman's functional view of consciousness, which I find rather dubious. If things only have identity because of some place in a flow diagram, we must ask why that thing has that place in that diagram.


The 16 ideas from '(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics'

Meaning from use of thoughts, constructed from concepts, which have a role relating to reality [Harman]
Some regard conceptual role semantics as an entirely internal matter [Harman]
Take meaning to be use in calculation with concepts, rather than in communication [Harman]
Mastery of a language requires thinking, and not just communication [Harman]
Concepts in thought have content, but not meaning, which requires communication [Harman]
The use theory attaches meanings to words, not to sentences [Harman]
If one proposition negates the other, which is the negative one? [Harman]
Reasoning aims at increasing explanatory coherence [Harman]
We have a theory of logic (implication and inconsistency), but not of inference or reasoning [Harman]
I might accept P and Q as likely, but reject P-and-Q as unlikely [Harman]
Reality is the overlap of true complete theories [Harman]
Reason conservatively: stick to your beliefs, and prefer reasoning that preserves most of them [Harman]
The way things look is a relational matter, not an intrinsic matter [Harman]
The content of thought is relations, between mental states, things in the world, and contexts [Harman]
There is no natural border between inner and outer [Harman]
We can only describe mental attitudes in relation to the external world [Harman]