more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12639

[filed under theme 18. Thought / D. Concepts / 3. Ontology of Concepts / c. Fregean concepts ]

Full Idea

Supposing the mind to be conversant with senses can, maybe, provide for a theory of the intentionality of mental states; but it seems to shed no light at all on the nature of mental processes (i.e. of mental state transitions).

Gist of Idea

Belief in 'senses' may explain intentionality, but not mental processes

Source

Jerry A. Fodor (LOT 2 [2008], Ch.3.3)

Book Ref

Fodor,Jerry A.: 'LOT 2: the Language of Thought Revisited' [OUP 2008], p.62


A Reaction

I would track this back to Frege's hostility to 'psychologism'. That is, Fregeans don't care about Fodor's problem, because all their accounts (of mathematics, of logic, and of concepts) treat the subject-matter as self-contained sui generis.


The 20 ideas with the same theme [concepts as meanings, distinct from a word's reference]:

Frege equated the concepts under which an object falls with its properties [Frege, by Dummett]
Concepts are the ontological counterparts of predicative expressions [Frege, by George/Velleman]
An assertion about the concept 'horse' must indirectly speak of an object [Frege, by Hale]
A concept is a function whose value is always a truth-value [Frege]
A concept is a function mapping objects onto truth-values, if they fall under the concept [Frege, by Dummett]
Frege took the study of concepts to be part of logic [Frege, by Shapiro]
Concepts are, precisely, the references of predicates [Frege, by Wright,C]
A concept is a non-psychological one-place function asserting something of an object [Frege, by Weiner]
Fregean concepts have precise boundaries and universal applicability [Frege, by Koslicki]
Psychological accounts of concepts are subjective, and ultimately destroy truth [Frege]
'The concept "horse"' denotes a concept, yet seems also to denote an object [Frege, by McGee]
Concepts only have a 'functional character', because they map to truth values, not objects [Dummett, by Davidson]
We can use 'concept' for the reference, and 'conception' for sense [Wiggins]
Frege's puzzles suggest to many that concepts have sense as well as reference [Fodor]
If concepts have sense, we can't see the connection to their causal powers [Fodor]
Belief in 'senses' may explain intentionality, but not mental processes [Fodor]
A sense is individuated by the conditions for reference [Peacocke]
Fregean concepts have their essence fixed by reference-conditions [Peacocke]
The Fregean concept of GREEN is a function assigning true to green things, and false to the rest [Hart,WD]
The phrase 'the concept "horse"' can't refer to a concept, because it is saturated [Potter]