more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12642

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 1. Reference theories ]

Full Idea

The representation of 'morning star' must be different from 'evening star' because their tokens differ in their causal powers.

Gist of Idea

Co-referring terms differ if they have different causal powers

Source

Jerry A. Fodor (LOT 2 [2008], Ch.3.3)

Book Ref

Fodor,Jerry A.: 'LOT 2: the Language of Thought Revisited' [OUP 2008], p.64


A Reaction

This is Fodor trying to avoid the standard Fregean move of proposing that there are 'senses' as well as references. See Idea 12629. If these two terms have the same extension, they are the same concept? They 'seem' to have two referents.

Related Idea

Idea 12629 For the referential view of thought, the content of a concept is just its reference [Fodor]


The 41 ideas from 'LOT 2'

Pragmatism is the worst idea ever [Fodor]
Knowing that must come before knowing how [Fodor]
Only the labels of nodes have semantic content in connectionism, and they play no role [Fodor]
If concept content is reference, then my Twin and I are referring to the same stuff [Fodor]
For the referential view of thought, the content of a concept is just its reference [Fodor]
Before you can plan action, you must decide on the truth of your estimate of success [Fodor]
Cartesians put concept individuation before concept possession [Fodor]
In the Representational view, concepts play the key linking role [Fodor]
Definitions often give necessary but not sufficient conditions for an extension [Fodor]
'Inferential-role semantics' says meaning is determined by role in inference [Fodor]
Having a concept isn't a pragmatic matter, but being able to think about the concept [Fodor]
Mental states have causal powers [Fodor]
Names in thought afford a primitive way to bring John before the mind [Fodor]
'Paderewski' has two names in mentalese, for his pianist file and his politician file [Fodor]
Some beliefs are only inferred when needed, like 'Shakespeare had not telephone' [Fodor]
Concepts have two sides; they are files that face thought, and also face subject-matter [Fodor]
We think in file names [Fodor]
Mental representations name things in the world, but also files in our memory [Fodor]
Frege's puzzles suggest to many that concepts have sense as well as reference [Fodor]
If concepts have sense, we can't see the connection to their causal powers [Fodor]
Belief in 'senses' may explain intentionality, but not mental processes [Fodor]
Co-referring terms differ if they have different causal powers [Fodor]
Associative thinking avoids syntax, but can't preserve sense, reference or truth [Fodor]
Connectionism gives no account of how constituents make complex concepts [Fodor]
Who cares what 'philosophy' is? Most pre-1950 thought doesn't now count as philosophy [Fodor]
Ambiguities in English are the classic reason for claiming that we don't think in English [Fodor]
Semantics (esp. referential semantics) allows inferences from utterances to the world [Fodor]
Semantics relates to the world, so it is never just psychological [Fodor]
There's statistical, logical, nomological, conceptual and metaphysical possibility [Fodor]
You can't think 'brown dog' without thinking 'brown' and 'dog' [Fodor]
Frame Problem: how to eliminate most beliefs as irrelevant, without searching them? [Fodor]
P-and-Q gets its truth from the truth of P and truth of Q, but consistency isn't like that [Fodor]
Abstractionism claims that instances provide criteria for what is shared [Fodor]
The different types of resemblance don't resemble one another [Fodor]
Nobody knows how concepts are acquired [Fodor]
We have an innate capacity to form a concept, once we have grasped the stereotype [Fodor]
Maybe stereotypes are a stage in concept acquisition (rather than a by-product) [Fodor]
One stereotype might be a paradigm for two difference concepts [Fodor]
We refer to individuals and to properties, and we use singular terms and predicates [Fodor]
A truth-table, not inferential role, defines 'and' [Fodor]
Compositionality requires that concepts be atomic [Fodor]