more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 12660
[filed under theme 18. Thought / D. Concepts / 4. Structure of Concepts / d. Concepts as prototypes
]
Full Idea
The same stereotype can give difference concepts; chickens are paradigmatic instances both of FOOD and of BARNYARD FOWL.
Clarification
Fodor uses capitals for the concept, rather than the word
Gist of Idea
One stereotype might be a paradigm for two difference concepts
Source
Jerry A. Fodor (LOT 2 [2008], Ch.5.4)
Book Ref
Fodor,Jerry A.: 'LOT 2: the Language of Thought Revisited' [OUP 2008], p.155
A Reaction
And I'm guessing that lots of concepts could have two equally plausible stereotypes, even within a single mind. Stereotypes are interesting, but they don't seem to be the key to our understanding of concepts.
The
22 ideas
with the same theme
[concepts as built around typical examples of things]:
12622
|
Many concepts lack prototypes, and complex prototypes aren't built from simple ones
[Fodor]
|
12659
|
Maybe stereotypes are a stage in concept acquisition (rather than a by-product)
[Fodor]
|
12660
|
One stereotype might be a paradigm for two difference concepts
[Fodor]
|
15688
|
Categories are characterized by distance from a prototype
[Gelman]
|
17975
|
There is no 'ideal' bird or dog, and prototypes give no information about variability
[Murphy]
|
17976
|
Prototypes are unified representations of the entire category (rather than of members)
[Murphy]
|
18691
|
The prototype theory uses observed features, but can't include their construction
[Murphy]
|
17983
|
The prototype theory handles hierarchical categories and combinations of concepts well
[Murphy]
|
17985
|
Prototypes theory of concepts is best, as a full description with weighted typical features
[Murphy]
|
17986
|
Learning concepts is forming prototypes with a knowledge structure
[Murphy]
|
11132
|
The prototype theory is probabilistic, picking something out if it has sufficient of the properties
[Margolis/Laurence]
|
11133
|
Prototype theory categorises by computing the number of shared constituents
[Margolis/Laurence]
|
11134
|
People don't just categorise by apparent similarities
[Margolis/Laurence]
|
11135
|
Complex concepts have emergent properties not in the ingredient prototypes
[Margolis/Laurence]
|
11136
|
Many complex concepts obviously have no prototype
[Margolis/Laurence]
|
18594
|
Knowing typical properties of things is especially useful in induction
[Machery]
|
18593
|
The term 'prototype' is used for both typical category members, and the representation
[Machery]
|
18595
|
Prototype theories are based on computation of similarities with the prototype
[Machery]
|
18596
|
Prototype theorists don't tell us how we select the appropriate prototype
[Machery]
|
18603
|
Maybe concepts are not the typical properties, but the ideal properties
[Machery]
|
18605
|
It is more efficient to remember the prototype, than repeatedly create it from exemplars
[Machery]
|
18606
|
The prototype view predicts that typical members are easier to categorise
[Machery]
|