more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12688

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 1. Foundations for Mathematics ]

Full Idea

I wish to explore the idea that mathematics is the formal study of the categorical dimensions of things.

Gist of Idea

Mathematics is the formal study of the categorical dimensions of things

Source

Brian Ellis (The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism [2009], 6)

Book Ref

Ellis,Brian: 'The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism' [Acument 2009], p.117


A Reaction

Categorical dimensions are spatiotemporal relations and other non-causal properties. Ellis defends categorical properties as an aspect of science. The obvious connection seems to be with structuralism in mathematics. Shapiro is sympathetic.


The 15 ideas with the same theme [existence of fundamentals as a basis for mathematics]:

We can't prove everything, but we can spell out the unproved, so that foundations are clear [Frege]
Pure mathematics is the relations between all possible objects, and is thus formal ontology [Husserl, by Velarde-Mayol]
Integers and induction are clear as foundations, but set-theory axioms certainly aren't [Skolem]
The study of mathematical foundations needs new non-mathematical concepts [Kreisel]
I do not believe mathematics either has or needs 'foundations' [Putnam]
Mathematics is the formal study of the categorical dimensions of things [Ellis]
The ultimate principles and concepts of mathematics are presumed, or grasped directly [Mayberry]
If proof and definition are central, then mathematics needs and possesses foundations [Mayberry]
Foundations need concepts, definition rules, premises, and proof rules [Mayberry]
Axiom theories can't give foundations for mathematics - that's using axioms to explain axioms [Mayberry]
There is no grounding for mathematics that is more secure than mathematics [Shapiro]
Categories are the best foundation for mathematics [Shapiro]
Is mathematics based on sets, types, categories, models or topology? [Friend]
Reducing real numbers to rationals suggested arithmetic as the foundation of maths [Colyvan]
Cantor and Dedekind aimed to give analysis a foundation in set theory (rather than geometry) [Rumfitt]