more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12690

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 3. Parts of Time / e. Present moment ]

Full Idea

The global wavefront that collapses when a light signal from the Big Bang is observed is what most plausibly defines the frontier between past and future.

Gist of Idea

The present is the collapse of the light wavefront from the Big Bang

Source

Brian Ellis (The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism [2009], 6)

Book Ref

Ellis,Brian: 'The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism' [Acument 2009], p.127


A Reaction

I'm not sure I understand this, but it is clearly worth passing on. Of all the deep mysteries, the 'present' time may be the deepest.


The 13 ideas with the same theme [nature of the present moment of time]:

We can't tell whether the changing present moment is one thing, or a succession of things [Aristotle]
The present moment is a link (of past to future), and also a limit (of past and of future) [Aristotle]
The present does not exist, so our immediate experience is actually part past and part future [Chrysippus, by Plutarch]
Time is continous and infinitely divisible, so there cannot be a wholly present time [Chrysippus, by Stobaeus]
Socrates either dies when he exists (before his death) or when he doesn't (after his death) [Sext.Empiricus]
If the present is just the limit of the past or the future, it can't exist because they don't exist [Sext.Empiricus]
We could be aware of time if senses briefly vibrated, extending their experience of movement [Russell, by Bardon]
In relativity the length of the 'present moment' is relative to distance from the observer [Heisenberg]
The pure present moment is too brief to be experienced [Armstrong]
The present is the collapse of the light wavefront from the Big Bang [Ellis]
If time is infinitely divisible, then the present must be infinitely short [Le Poidevin]
The moving spotlight says entities can have properties of being present, past or future [Baron/Miller]
The present moment is a matter of existence, not of acquiring a property [Baron/Miller]