more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Nor is there any reason why souls or things analogous to souls should not be everywhere, even if dominant and consequently intelligent souls, like human souls, cannot be everywhere.
Gist of Idea
Something rather like souls (though not intelligent) could be found everywhere
Source
Gottfried Leibniz (On Nature Itself (De Ipsa Natura) [1698], §12)
Book Ref
Leibniz,Gottfried: 'Philosophical Essays', ed/tr. Arlew,R /Garber,D [Hackett 1989], p.163
A Reaction
He is always flirting with panpsychism, though he doesn't seem to offer any account of how these little baby souls can be built up to create one intelligent soul, the latter being indivisible. 'Souls' are very different from things 'analous to souls'!
12755 | Final causes can help with explanations in physics [Leibniz] |
11854 | If there is some trace of God in things, that would explain their natural force [Leibniz] |
12756 | Substance is a force for acting and being acted upon [Leibniz] |
12758 | It is plausible to think substances contain the same immanent force seen in our free will [Leibniz] |
12759 | There are atoms of substance, but no atoms of bulk or extension [Leibniz] |
12718 | Secondary matter is active and complete; primary matter is passive and incomplete [Leibniz] |
12760 | Something rather like souls (though not intelligent) could be found everywhere [Leibniz] |
19408 | To say that nature or the one universal substance is God is a pernicious doctrine [Leibniz] |