more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12797

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 4. Variables in Logic ]

Full Idea

If a plural variable is said to have not a single value but some values (some clothes), then a non-count variable may have, more quirkier still, some value (some clothing, for instance) in ranging arbitrarily over the scattered stuff.

Gist of Idea

If plural variables have 'some values', then non-count variables have 'some value'

Source

Henry Laycock (Words without Objects [2006], 4.4)

Book Ref

Laycock,Henry: 'Words without Objects' [OUP 2006], p.135


A Reaction

We seem to need the notion of a sample, or an archetype, to fit the bill. I hereby name them 'sample variables'. Damn - Laycock got there first, on p.137.


The 19 ideas with the same theme [symbols which do not yet have a determined value]:

The idea of a variable is fundamental [Russell]
Variables don't stand alone, but exist as parts of propositional functions [Russell]
Variables are auxiliary notions, and not part of the 'eternal' essence of logic [Schönfinkel]
'Object' is a pseudo-concept, properly indicated in logic by the variable x [Wittgenstein]
'Corner quotes' (quasi-quotation) designate 'whatever these terms designate' [Quine]
We study bound variables not to know reality, but to know what reality language asserts [Quine]
Perhaps variables could be dispensed with, by arrows joining places in the scope of quantifiers [Hacking]
Variables are just like pronouns; syntactic explanations get muddled over dummy letters [Inwagen]
I think of variables as objects rather than as signs [Fine,K]
It seemed that Frege gave the syntax for variables, and Tarski the semantics, and that was that [Fine,K]
In separate expressions variables seem identical in role, but in the same expression they aren't [Fine,K]
The usual Tarskian interpretation of variables is to specify their range of values [Fine,K]
Variables can be viewed as special terms - functions taking assignments into individuals [Fine,K]
The 'algebraic' account of variables reduces quantification to the algebra of its component parts [Fine,K]
'Instantial' accounts of variables say we grasp arbitrary instances from their use in quantification [Fine,K]
All occurrences of variables in atomic formulas are free [Burgess]
When a variable is 'free' of the quantifier, the result seems incapable of truth or falsity [Sider]
We now see that generalizations use variables rather than abstract entities [Sorensen]
If plural variables have 'some values', then non-count variables have 'some value' [Laycock]