more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12852

[filed under theme 9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / b. Sums of parts ]

Full Idea

Chisholm has an axiom: if x is a proper part of y, then necessarily if y exists then x is part of it. If x is ever part of y, they y is necessarily such that x is part of y at any time that y exists.

Gist of Idea

If x is ever part of y, then y is necessarily such that x is part of y at any time that y exists

Source

report of Roderick Chisholm (Person and Object [1976], p.149) by Peter Simons - Parts 5.3

Book Ref

Simons,Peter: 'Parts: a Study in Ontology' [OUP 1987], p.189


A Reaction

This is Chisholm's notorious mereological essentialism, that all parts are necessary, and change of part means change of thing. However, it looks to me more like a proposal about what properties are necessary, not what are essential.


The 32 ideas from 'Person and Object'

Many philosophers aim to understand metaphysics by studying ourselves [Chisholm]
I use variables to show that each item remains the same entity throughout [Chisholm]
Bad theories of the self see it as abstract, or as a bundle, or as a process [Chisholm]
The property of being identical with me is an individual concept [Chisholm]
A state of affairs pertains to a thing if it implies that it has some property [Chisholm]
If some dogs are brown, that entails the properties of 'being brown' and 'being canine' [Chisholm]
Being the tallest man is an 'individual concept', but not a haecceity [Chisholm]
A haecceity is a property had necessarily, and strictly confined to one entity [Chisholm]
A traditional individual essence includes all of a thing's necessary characteristics [Chisholm]
Maybe we can only individuate things by relating them to ourselves [Chisholm]
I am picked out uniquely by my individual essence, which is 'being identical with myself' [Chisholm]
People use 'I' to refer to themselves, with the meaning of their own individual essence [Chisholm]
A peach is sweet and fuzzy, but it doesn't 'have' those qualities [Chisholm]
Sartre says the ego is 'opaque'; I prefer to say that it is 'transparent' [Chisholm]
Do sense-data have structure, location, weight, and constituting matter? [Chisholm]
'I feel depressed' is more like 'he runs slowly' than like 'he has a red book' [Chisholm]
If we can say a man senses 'redly', why not also 'rectangularly'? [Chisholm]
So called 'sense-data' are best seen as 'modifications' of the person experiencing them [Chisholm]
A 'law of nature' is just something which is physically necessary [Chisholm]
Determinism claims that every event has a sufficient causal pre-condition [Chisholm]
The concept of physical necessity is basic to both causation, and to the concept of nature [Chisholm]
Some propose a distinct 'agent causation', as well as 'event causation' [Chisholm]
There are mere omissions (through ignorance, perhaps), and people can 'commit an omission' [Chisholm]
There is 'loose' identity between things if their properties, or truths about them, might differ [Chisholm]
Some properties, such as 'being a widow', can be seen as 'rooted outside the time they are had' [Chisholm]
I propose that events and propositions are two types of states of affairs [Chisholm]
Some properties can never be had, like being a round square [Chisholm]
The mark of a state of affairs is that it is capable of being accepted [Chisholm]
Explanations have states of affairs as their objects [Chisholm]
Events are states of affairs that occur at certain places and times [Chisholm]
If x is ever part of y, then y is necessarily such that x is part of y at any time that y exists [Chisholm, by Simons]
Intermittence is seen in a toy fort, which is dismantled then rebuilt with the same bricks [Chisholm, by Simons]