more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12921

[filed under theme 9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 1. Unifying an Object / b. Unifying aggregates ]

Full Idea

There are degrees of accidental unity, and an ordered society has more unity than a chaotic mob, and an organic body or a machine has more unity than a society.

Gist of Idea

Accidental unity has degrees, from a mob to a society to a machine or organism

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (Letters to Antoine Arnauld [1686], 1687.04.30)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'The Leibniz-Arnauld Correspondence', ed/tr. Mason,HT/Parkinson,GHR [Manchester UP 1967], p.126


A Reaction

This immediately invites questions about the extremes. Why does the very highest degree of 'accidental unity' not achieve 'true unity'? And why cannot a very ununified aggregate have a bit of unity (as in unrestricted mereological composition)?

Related Idea

Idea 12743 A true being must (unlike a chain) have united parts, with a substantial form as its subject [Leibniz]


The 18 ideas with the same theme [whether a mere assemblage of parts can be unified]:

Democritus denies reality to large objects, because atomic entities can't combine to produce new ones [Benardete,JA on Democritus]
Parts must belong to a created thing with a distinct form [Plato]
Things are one to the extent that they are indivisible [Aristotle]
Indivisibility is the cause of unity, either in movement, or in the account or thought [Aristotle]
Things are unified by contact, mixture and position [Aristotle]
A 'body' is a conception of an aggregate, with properties defined by application conditions [Epicurus]
'One' can mean undivided and not a multitude, or it can add measurement, giving number [Aquinas]
It is absurd that there is no difference between a genuinely unified thing, and a mere aggregate [Duns Scotus]
If a whole body is moved, its parts must move with it [Hobbes]
A thing is unified if its parts produce a single effect [Spinoza]
Particles mutually attract, and cohere at short distances [Newton]
A body would be endless disunited parts, if it did not have a unifying form or soul [Leibniz]
Accidental unity has degrees, from a mob to a society to a machine or organism [Leibniz]
A set has some sort of unity, but not enough to be a 'whole' [Russell]
Every physical thing is either a living organism or a simple [Inwagen]
'The rock' either refers to an object, or to a collection of parts, or to some stuff [Burke,M, by Wasserman]
Things can't be fusions of universals, because two things could then be one thing [Oliver]
Abstract sets of universals can't be bundled to make concrete things [Oliver]