more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12934

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / B. Contract Ethics / 2. Golden Rule ]

Full Idea

We would wish for more than our share if we had our own way; so do we also owe to others more than their share? If the rule applies only to a just will, the rule will need a standard. The rule means that to judge fairly we must adopt others' viewpoints.

Gist of Idea

We can't want everyone to have more than their share, so a further standard is needed

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (New Essays on Human Understanding [1704], 1.02)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'New Essays on Human Understanding', ed/tr. Remnant/Bennett [CUP 1996], p.91


A Reaction

The first part of this is moving towards Kant's rational overview of ethics. Leibniz is wholly right here. All ethics faces the problem that initial values are needed to get it off the ground. What's wrong with pain, or unfairness, or hatred?


The 14 ideas with the same theme [treat others as you would like to be treated]:

Do not do to others what you would not desire yourself [Kongzi (Confucius)]
If people regarded other states as they did their own, they would never attack them [Mozi]
The Torah just says: do not do to your neighbour what is hateful to you [Hillel the Elder]
Treat others as you would have them treat you [Jesus]
For Hobbes the Golden Rule concerns not doing things, whereas Jesus encourages active love [Hobbes, by Flanagan]
We can't want everyone to have more than their share, so a further standard is needed [Leibniz]
The Golden Rule is accepted everywhere, and gives a fixed target for morality [Voltaire]
The better Golden Rule is 'do good for yourself without harming others' [Rousseau]
We shouldn't do to others what would be a wrong to us in similar circumstances [Reid]
The 'golden rule' cannot be a universal law as it implies no duties [Kant]
If you feel to others as they feel to themselves, you must hate a self-hater [Nietzsche]
The Golden Rule prohibits harmful actions, with the premise that actions will be requited [Nietzsche]
The categorical imperative is not the Golden Rule, which concerns contingent desires [Sandel]
Universal moral judgements imply the Golden Rule ('do as you would be done by') [Hooker,B]