more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12949

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 1. Scepticism ]

Full Idea

Since rays of light need time - however little - to reach us, it is possible that the object should be destroyed during the interval and no longer exist when the light reaches the eye.

Gist of Idea

Light takes time to reach us, so objects we see may now not exist

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (New Essays on Human Understanding [1704], 2.09)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'New Essays on Human Understanding', ed/tr. Remnant/Bennett [CUP 1996], p.135


A Reaction

This is the well know 'time lag' argument. Leibniz is no sceptic, but he can hardly fail to accept the truth of this problem. It seems self-evident that stars we observe may no longer exist, although special relativity confuses that issue.


The 33 ideas with the same theme [general doubts about the possibility of knowledge]:

If we succeed in speaking the truth, we cannot know we have done it [Xenophanes]
Protagoras was the first to claim that there are two contradictory arguments about everything [Protagoras, by Diog. Laertius]
Cratylus decided speech was hopeless, and his only expression was the movement of a finger [Cratylus, by Aristotle]
Democritus says there is either no truth, or it is concealed from us [Democritus, by Aristotle]
We actually know nothing, and opinions are mere flux [Democritus]
We in fact know nothing, but we each restructure our reality with beliefs [Democritus]
It is obviously impossible to understand the reality of each thing [Democritus]
We know nothing in reality; for truth lies in an abyss [Democritus]
There can't be any knowledge if things are constantly changing [Plato]
Anaxarchus said that he was not even sure that he knew nothing [Anaxarchus, by Diog. Laertius]
The Pyrrhonians attacked the dogmas of professors, not ordinary people [Pyrrho, by Fogelin]
Epicurus denied knowledge in order to retain morality or hedonism as the highest values [Nietzsche on Epicurus]
The basis of scepticism is the claim that every proposition has an equal opposing proposition [Sext.Empiricus]
Scepticism has two dogmas: that nothing is definable, and every argument has an opposite argument [Diog. Laertius]
Sceptics say there is truth, but no means of making or testing lasting judgements [Montaigne]
Descartes can't begin again, because sceptics doubt cognitive processes as well as beliefs [Pollock/Cruz on Descartes]
Even if my body and objects are imaginary, there may be simpler things which are true [Descartes]
Light takes time to reach us, so objects we see may now not exist [Leibniz]
Reason can never show that experiences are connected to external objects [Hume]
Mitigated scepticism draws attention to the limitations of human reason, and encourages modesty [Hume]
Kant thought he had refuted scepticism, but his critics say he is a sceptic, for rejecting reality [O'Grady on Kant]
Our knowledge is illogical, because it rests on false identities between things [Nietzsche]
The most extreme scepticism is when you even give up logic [Nietzsche]
Doubts can't exist if they are inexpressible or unanswerable [Wittgenstein]
Maybe billions of changeless years have elapsed since my last meal [Shoemaker]
Protagoras says arguments on both sides are always equal [Kim, by Seneca]
There are two contradictory arguments about everything [Kim]
No one knows anything, and no one is ever justified or reasonable [Unger]
Without confidence in our beliefs, how should we actually live? [Tuck]
Scepticism just reveals our limited ability to explain things [Williams,M]
Scepticism about reality is possible because existence isn't part of appearances [McGinn]
We assess error against background knowledge, but that is just what radical scepticism challenges [Pritchard,D]
A toper who spies in the distance... [Sommers,W]