more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13118

[filed under theme 7. Existence / E. Categories / 1. Categories ]

Full Idea

My fundamental idea is that 'form-sets' are intersubstitutable constituents of states of affairs with the same form, and 'base-sets' are special form-sets which can be used to construct other form-sets. Ontological categories are the base-sets.

Gist of Idea

Categories are base-sets which are used to construct states of affairs

Source

Jan Westerhoff (Ontological Categories [2005], Intro)

Book Ref

Westerhoff,Jan: 'Ontological Categories' [OUP 2005], p.7


A Reaction

The spirit of this is, of course, to try to achieve the kind of rigour that is expected in contemporary professional philosophy, by aiming for some sort of axiom-system that is related to a well established precise discipline like set theory. Maybe.


The 14 ideas from Jan Westerhoff

How far down before we are too specialised to have a category? [Westerhoff]
Maybe objects in the same category have the same criteria of identity [Westerhoff]
Categories are base-sets which are used to construct states of affairs [Westerhoff]
Ontological categories are like formal axioms, not unique and with necessary membership [Westerhoff]
Categories merely systematise, and are not intrinsic to objects [Westerhoff]
Categories can be ordered by both containment and generality [Westerhoff]
All systems have properties and relations, and most have individuals, abstracta, sets and events [Westerhoff]
Categories are held to explain why some substitutions give falsehood, and others meaninglessness [Westerhoff]
Categories systematize our intuitions about generality, substitutability, and identity [Westerhoff]
Categories as generalities don't give a criterion for a low-level cut-off point [Westerhoff]
Essential kinds may be too specific to provide ontological categories [Westerhoff]
The aim is that everything should belong in some ontological category or other [Westerhoff]
We negate predicates but do not negate names [Westerhoff]
A thing's ontological category depends on what else exists, so it is contingent [Westerhoff]