more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13124

[filed under theme 7. Existence / E. Categories / 1. Categories ]

Full Idea

Categories are usually not assumed to be ordered by containment, but also be generality.

Gist of Idea

Categories can be ordered by both containment and generality

Source

Jan Westerhoff (Ontological Categories [2005], §02)

Book Ref

Westerhoff,Jan: 'Ontological Categories' [OUP 2005], p.19


A Reaction

I much prefer generality, which is responsive to the full picture, whereas containment seems to appeal too much to the orderly and formalised mind. Containments overlap, so we can't dream of a perfectly neat system.


The 21 ideas with the same theme [general ideas about how to group what exists]:

There are two sorts of category - referring to things, and to circumstances of things [Boethius]
Categories are general concepts of objects, which determine the way in which they are experienced [Kant]
Categories are necessary, so can't be implanted in us to agree with natural laws [Kant]
Even simple propositions about sensations are filled with categories [Hegel]
Thought about particulars is done entirely through categories [Hegel]
No need for a priori categories, since sufficient reason shows the interrelations [Schopenhauer, by Lewis,PB]
In formal terms, a category is the range of some style of variables [Quine]
Categories can't overlap; they are either disjoint, or inclusive [Sommers, by Westerhoff]
The category of Venus is not 'object', or even 'planet', but a particular class of good-sized object [Jubien]
All descriptive language is classificatory [Dupré]
Ontological categories are not natural kinds: the latter can only be distinguished using the former [Lowe]
Categories are base-sets which are used to construct states of affairs [Westerhoff]
How far down before we are too specialised to have a category? [Westerhoff]
Maybe objects in the same category have the same criteria of identity [Westerhoff]
Categories can be ordered by both containment and generality [Westerhoff]
Categories are held to explain why some substitutions give falsehood, and others meaninglessness [Westerhoff]
Categories systematize our intuitions about generality, substitutability, and identity [Westerhoff]
Categories as generalities don't give a criterion for a low-level cut-off point [Westerhoff]
Monothetic categories have fixed defining features, and polythetic categories do not [Ellen]
In symbolic classification, the categories are linked to rules [Ellen]
Do categories store causal knowledge, or typical properties, or knowledge of individuals? [Machery]