more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13135

[filed under theme 7. Existence / E. Categories / 5. Category Anti-Realism ]

Full Idea

What ontological category a thing belongs to is not dependent on its inner nature, but dependent on what other things there are in the world, and this is a contingent matter.

Gist of Idea

A thing's ontological category depends on what else exists, so it is contingent

Source

Jan Westerhoff (Ontological Categories [2005], §89)

Book Ref

Westerhoff,Jan: 'Ontological Categories' [OUP 2005], p.218


A Reaction

This is aimed at those, like Wiggins, who claim that category is essential to a thing, and there is no possible world in which that things could belong to another category. Sounds good, till you try to come up with examples.


The 19 ideas with the same theme [belief that our categories can't or don't map reality]:

It is not possible to know what sort each thing is [Democritus]
Our words and concepts don't always correspond to what is out there [William of Ockham]
Ockham was an anti-realist about the categories [William of Ockham, by Pasnau]
There are no gaps in the continuum of nature, and everything has something closely resembling it [Locke]
Hegel said Kant's fixed categories actually vary with culture and era [Hegel, by Houlgate]
Categories are not metaphysical truths, but inventions in the service of needs [Nietzsche]
Philosophers find it particularly hard to shake off belief in necessary categories [Nietzsche]
Nihilism results from valuing the world by the 'categories of reason', because that is fiction [Nietzsche]
A world can be full of variety or not, depending on how we sort it [Goodman]
Discourse generally departmentalizes itself to some degree [Quine]
We don't want another new set of categories; we want a variety of flexible categories [Deleuze, by May]
Extreme nominalists say all classification is arbitrary convention [Quinton]
If some peoples do not have categories like time or cause, they can't be essential features of rationality [Cooper,DE]
Concepts don't carve up the world, which has endless overlooked or ignored divisions [Heil]
Ontological categories are like formal axioms, not unique and with necessary membership [Westerhoff]
Categories merely systematise, and are not intrinsic to objects [Westerhoff]
A thing's ontological category depends on what else exists, so it is contingent [Westerhoff]
Continuous experience sometimes needs imposition of boundaries to create categories [Ellen]
There may be ad hoc categories, such as the things to pack in your suitcase for a trip [Machery]