more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 13244
[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 3. Types of Necessity
]
Full Idea
In relevant logic, the necessary truths are not those which are true in every situation; rather, they are those for which it is necessary that there is a situation making them true.
Gist of Idea
Relevant necessity is always true for some situation (not all situations)
Source
JC Beall / G Restall (Logical Pluralism [2006], 5.2)
Book Ref
Beall,J/Restall,G: 'Logical Pluralism' [OUP 2006], p.53
A Reaction
This seems to rest on the truthmaker view of such things, which I find quite attractive (despite Merricks's assault). Always ask what is making some truth necessary. This leads you to essences.
The
23 ideas
from 'Logical Pluralism'
13232
|
Logic studies arguments, not formal languages; this involves interpretations
[Beall/Restall]
|
13233
|
Propositions commit to content, and not to any way of spelling it out
[Beall/Restall]
|
13235
|
Logic studies consequence; logical truths are consequences of everything, or nothing
[Beall/Restall]
|
13234
|
The view of logic as knowing a body of truths looks out-of-date
[Beall/Restall]
|
13236
|
Logical truth is much more important if mathematics rests on it, as logicism claims
[Beall/Restall]
|
13237
|
Preface Paradox affirms and denies the conjunction of propositions in the book
[Beall/Restall]
|
13238
|
Syllogisms are only logic when they use variables, and not concrete terms
[Beall/Restall]
|
13239
|
Judgement is always predicating a property of a subject
[Beall/Restall]
|
13240
|
A sentence follows from others if they always model it
[Beall/Restall]
|
13241
|
The model theory of classical predicate logic is mathematics
[Beall/Restall]
|
13243
|
Excluded middle must be true for some situation, not for all situations
[Beall/Restall]
|
13242
|
It's 'relevantly' valid if all those situations make it true
[Beall/Restall]
|
13244
|
Relevant necessity is always true for some situation (not all situations)
[Beall/Restall]
|
13245
|
Relevant consequence says invalidity is the conclusion not being 'in' the premises
[Beall/Restall]
|
13246
|
Relevant logic does not abandon classical logic
[Beall/Restall]
|
13247
|
A truthmaker is an object which entails a sentence
[Beall/Restall]
|
13248
|
We can rest truth-conditions on situations, rather than on possible worlds
[Beall/Restall]
|
13249
|
(∀x)(A v B) |- (∀x)A v (∃x)B) is valid in classical logic but invalid intuitionistically
[Beall/Restall]
|
13250
|
Free logic terms aren't existential; classical is non-empty, with referring names
[Beall/Restall]
|
13252
|
Some truths have true negations
[Beall/Restall]
|
13254
|
A doesn't imply A - that would be circular
[Beall/Restall]
|
13255
|
Relevant logic may reject transitivity
[Beall/Restall]
|
13253
|
There are several different consequence relations
[Beall/Restall]
|