more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13339

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / I. Semantics of Logic / 4. Satisfaction ]

Full Idea

Here is a partial definition of the concept of satisfaction: John and Peter satisfy the sentential function 'X and Y are brothers' if and only if John and Peter are brothers.

Gist of Idea

A sentence is satisfied when we can assert the sentence when the variables are assigned

Source

Alfred Tarski (The Establishment of Scientific Semantics [1936], p.405)

Book Ref

Tarski,Alfred: 'Logic, Semantics, Meta-mathematics' [Hackett 1956], p.405


A Reaction

Satisfaction applies to open sentences and truth to closed sentences (with named objects). He uses the notion of total satisfaction to define truth. The example is a partial definition, not just an illustration.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [evaluating as True after all truth assignments are made]:

A sentence is satisfied when we can assert the sentence when the variables are assigned [Tarski]
Satisfaction is the easiest semantical concept to define, and the others will reduce to it [Tarski]
'Satisfaction' is a generalised form of reference [Davidson]
A truth assignment to the components of a wff 'satisfy' it if the wff is then True [Enderton]
|= should be read as 'is a model for' or 'satisfies' [Hodges,W]
An open sentence is satisfied if the object possess that property [Kirkham]
'Satisfaction' is a function from models, assignments, and formulas to {true,false} [Shapiro]
A sentence is 'satisfiable' if it has a model [Shapiro]
Validity (for truth) and demonstrability (for proof) have correlates in satisfiability and consistency [Burgess]
A sentence-set is 'satisfiable' if at least one truth-assignment makes them all true [Zalabardo]
Some formulas are 'satisfiable' if there is a structure and interpretation that makes them true [Zalabardo]
Satisfaction is a primitive notion, and very liable to semantical paradoxes [Horsten]